The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What's on the path? Path dependence, organizational diversity and the problem of institutional change in the US economy, 1900–1950
Abstract
Institutionalists commonly invoke exogenous shocks or the transposition of logics across national systems to explain institutional change and new path creation. Using organizational data on American infrastructure industries, this paper shows instead how established institutional paths contain within them possibilities and resources for transformation and off-path organization. Even settled paths are typically littered with flotsam and jetsam—with elements of alternative economic orders and abandoned or partly realized institutional projects. These elements of ‘paths not taken’ are legacies of constitutional struggles and movements for alternative forms of order whose settlement or defeat help fix the path that triumphed. Moreover, they represent resources for endogenous institutional change, including the revival, reassembly, redeployment and subsequent elaboration of alternative logics within national capitalisms. As the analysis of the US case shows, such legacies underwrote the construction of an entirely different, cooperatively organized path alongside the dominant path of impersonal markets and for-profit corporations. Taken together, these findings generate new leverage for explaining institutional change. They also highlight features of the US case that have been ignored by institutionalist and ‘varieties of capitalism’ research, including internal structural variety, endogenous change processes, and the co-evolution of cooperative or coordinated and liberal market economies within American capitalism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics
Pierson, P. (2000) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/2586011 · Cited by 8,094 · cited 2×
“…rarely fundamental, that enduring patterns of behaviour remain, and that changes which seem radical or discontinuous are, on closer examination, really just incremental transformations, extensions or elaborations of established logics (Western, 1995; Dobbin, 1994; Campbell, 1997; Pierson, 2000).”
Background
Cited by
Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh: How Intermediaries Work Institutional Voids
Mair, J., Martí, I., & Ventresca, M. J. (2012) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2010.0627 · Cited by 1,207
Hotho, J. J. (2014) · Organization Studies · doi:10.1177/0170840613502767 · Cited by 113
The Infrastructure of Collective Action and Policy Content Diffusion in the Organic Food Industry
Lee, B. H. (2009) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.47084925 · Cited by 104
Boucher, M., & Pigeon, M.-A. (2024) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103618 · Cited by 43
Diab, A. (2021) · Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies · doi:10.1108/jaee-06-2020-0126 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Schneiberg, M.
- Venue
- Socio-Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-03-10
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 47-80
- ISSN
- 1475-1461 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-147X
- OpenAlex
- W2106355711
- Cited by
- 388
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.