The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interracial Contact and Black Racial Attitudes: The Contact Hypothesis and Selectivity Bias
Abstract
One of the most serious criticisms of research on the contact hypothesis is the contention that selection bias operates to promote interaction between whites and blacks who are already relatively unprejudiced toward one another. Accordingly, attempts to infer the effect of interracial contact on racial attitudes must recognize and correct for this potential source of bias. Endogenous switching regression models are used to estimate the effect of close interracial friendship on selected racial attitude variables while accounting for possible selectivity bias. Each model implies a distinct assumption about the process generating interracial contact and racial attitudes. Using data from the National Survey of Black Americans, we find no evidence of sample selection bias in estimating the effect of close interracial contact on black racial attitudes. Therefore, we cannot reject the conventional models used in research on the contact hypothesis that treat interracial contact as an exogenous variable affecting racial attitudes. However, our results show the usefulness of a switching regressions approach to reveal the contingent nature of the contact hypothesis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Models for Sample Selection Bias
Winship, C., & Mare, R. D. (1992) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.18.080192.001551 · Cited by 812
Cited by
A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory.
Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006) · Journal of personality and social psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751 · Cited by 9,708
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65 · Cited by 6,001
Prejudice Reduction: What Works? A Review and Assessment of Research and Practice
Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163607 · Cited by 1,376
McLaren, L. M. (2003) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2003.0038 · Cited by 1,017
Reconciling Context and Contact Effects on Racial Attitudes
Stein, R. M., Post, S. S., & Rinden, A. L. (2000) · Political Research Quarterly · doi:10.1177/106591290005300204 · Cited by 314
Metadata
- Authors
- Powers, D. A., & Ellison, C. G.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1995-09-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 205-205
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2029712675
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interracial Contact and Black Racial Attitudes: The Contact Hypothesis and Selectivity Bias. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/74.1.205
- The paper
- Powers, D. A., & Ellison, C. G. (1995). Interracial Contact and Black Racial Attitudes: The Contact Hypothesis and Selectivity Bias. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/74.1.205
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.