The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Race/Ethnicity, Nativity, and Infant Mortality in the United States
Abstract
The overall purpose of this article is to examine population differences in the risk of infant mortality by race/ethnicity, with special attention given to the influence of nativity. Data are taken from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) linked birth/infant death files for 1989–91. These files cover virtually the entire nation, provide highly reliable data for relatively small racial/ethnic subpopulations, and have recently been updated to include new variables of interest. Results show that there is wide variation in the risk of infant death across racial/ethnic groups, with infants born to black women suffering the highest risks and infants of Japanese women experiencing the lowest risks. It is also clear that nativity has a crucial impact on racial/ethnic differentials in infant mortality. In fact, the favorable infant survival rates of many racial/ethnic groups are largely attributable to a high percentage of births to immigrant women, who are characterized by overall lower infant mortality than native-born women. Both the racial/ethnic differentials in mortality and the effect of nativity, in turn, are due to several sets of factors, the importance of which varies by race/ethnicity. Models of infant mortality estimated separately by race/ethnicity also revealed that the direction of effects for mortality risk factors tends to be the same across groups, although the magnitudes vary. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that general efforts to lower infant mortality will have a beneficial impact for all groups.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kotelchuck, M. (1994) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.84.9.1486 · Cited by 485
Cited by
Race, race-based discrimination, and health outcomes among African Americans
Mays, V. M., Cochran, S. D., & Barnes, N. W. (2007) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190212 · Cited by 889
Acculturation Stress, Social Support, and Self-Rated Health Among Latinos in California
Finch, B. K., & Vega, W. A. (2003) · Journal of Immigrant Health · doi:10.1023/a:1023987717921 · Cited by 697
Immigration and the Health of Asian and Pacific Islander Adults in the United States
Parker Frisbie, W., Cho, Y., & Hummer, R. A. (2001) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/153.4.372 · Cited by 499
Self-citationCommon themes of resilience among Latino immigrant families: a systematic review of the literature
Cardoso, J. B., & Thompson, S. J. (2010) · Families in Society The Journal of Contemporary Social Services · doi:10.1606/1044-3894.4003 · Cited by 229
Racial Disparities in Preterm Birth
Culhane, J. F., & Goldenberg, R. L. (2011) · Seminars in Perinatology · doi:10.1053/j.semperi.2011.02.020 · Cited by 196
Metadata
- Authors
- Hummer, R. A., Biegler, M., Turk, P. B. D., Forbes, D., Frisbie, W. P., Hong, Y., & Pullum, S. G.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 1999-03-01
- Volume
- 77
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1083-1083
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2109743112
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 18.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Race/Ethnicity, Nativity, and Infant Mortality in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/77.3.1083
- The paper
- Hummer, R. A., Biegler, M., Turk, P. B. D., Forbes, D., Frisbie, W. P., Hong, Y., & Pullum, S. G. (1999). Race/Ethnicity, Nativity, and Infant Mortality in the United States. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/77.3.1083
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.