Cited by 697Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchMigration, Health and TraumaHealth disparities and outcomes

Acculturation Stress, Social Support, and Self-Rated Health Among Latinos in California

Finch, Brian Karl, Vega, William A.·2003·Journal of Immigrant Health

Abstract

This study looks at the effect of social support mechanisms as potential moderators and mediators of the relationship between stressful acculturation experiences and self-ratings of physical health. Data are from a sample of 3012 Mexican-origin adults aged 18-59 sampled under a probabilistic, stratified, cluster sampling design in Fresno County, California. While acculturation stressors (i.e., discrimination, legal status, and language conflict) all had a gross positive effect on the likelihood of rating oneself in fair/poor health, only legal status stress had a net effect. In addition, greater numbers of peers and family members in the United States, and a higher reliance on religious support mechanisms decreased the likelihood of reporting fair/poor health. However, levels of both instrumental social support and religious support seeking moderated the (nonsignificant, main) effects of discrimination on physical health. This study indicates that physical health is negatively associated with acculturation stressors and positively associated with social support; discrimination is only associated with poorer physical health among those for whom social support is lacking.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1023/a:1023987717921

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the 33 highest quality studies, five (15%) reported mixed results.

    “Considering the 33 highest quality studies, 13 (39%) reported significantly better physical functioning among those who were more R/S (including one study at a trend level) [483–495], six (18%) found worse functioning [496–501], and five studies (15%) reported mixed results [82, 124, 502–504] (significant positive and negative associations, depending on R/S characteristic).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finch, B. K., & Vega, W. A.
Affiliations
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US)
Corresponding author
Finch, Brian Karl
Venue
Journal of Immigrant Health
Published
2003-07
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
109-117
ISSN
  • 1096-4045 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-3629
OpenAlex
W1546075712
Cited by
697
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 43 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 63
FWCI
49.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Immigrant Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01da012167-03, 5r01mh051192-04)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH51192)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA 12167)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
acculturative stress, social support, self-rated health, Hispanic Americans, Mexican-origin adults, discrimination, legal status, language conflict, religious support, instrumental support, health disparities
MeSH terms
Acculturation, Adolescent, Adult, California, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prejudice, Self Concept, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Cluster Analysis, Mexican Americans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review