The DOI matches its OpenAlex record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art
Open accessAbstract
Recently scholars have devoted renewed attention to the role of religion in American life. Thus, it is important that they use the most effective means available to categorize and study religious groups. However, the most widely used classification scheme in survey research (T.W. Smith 1990) does not capture essential differences between American religious traditions and overlooks significant new trends in religious affiliation. We critique this scheme based on its historical, terminological, and taxonomical inaccuracy and offer a new approach that addresses its shortcomings by using denominational affiliation to place respondents into seven categories grounded in the historical development of American religious traditions. Most important, this new scheme yields more meaningful interpretations because the categories refer to concrete religious traditions. Because of increased accuracy in classification, it also improves model fit and reduces measurement error.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Have American's Social Attitudes Become More Polarized?
DiMaggio, P., Evans, J., & Bryson, B. (1996) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/230995 · Cited by 1,250
Cited by
Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide
Norris, P., & Inglehart, R. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511791017 · Cited by 1,795
Atheists as “other”: Moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society
Edgell, P., Gerteis, J., & Hartmann, D. (2006) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240607100203 · Cited by 914
Inequality, Trust, and Civic Engagement
Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005) · American Politics Research · doi:10.1177/1532673x04271903 · Cited by 872
Religious Involvement, Stress, and Mental Health: Findings from the 1995 Detroit Area Study
Ellison, C. G., Boardman, J. D., Williams, D. R., & Jackson, J. S. (2001) · Social Forces · doi:10.1353/sof.2001.0063 · Cited by 527
Religious Involvement and Status‐Bridging Social Capital
Wuthnow, R. (2002) · Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion · doi:10.1111/1468-5906.00153 · Cited by 462
Metadata
- Authors
- Steensland, B., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M., & Woodberry, R. D.
- Venue
- Social Forces
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press
- Published
- 2000-09-01
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 291-291
- ISSN
- 0037-7732 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2133004400
- Cited by
- 1,823
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 76.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sf/79.1.291
- The paper
- Steensland, B., Robinson, L. D., Wilcox, W. B., Park, J. Z., Regnerus, M., & Woodberry, R. D. (2000). The Measure of American Religion: Toward Improving the State of the Art. Social Forces. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/79.1.291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.