Effects of pine and hardwood basal areas after uneven-aged silvicultural treatments on wildlife habitat
Abstract
Uneven-aged management (UEAM) is becoming increasingly popular in the southeastern United States. However, effects of UEAM on wildlife habitat have not been adequately documented. We examined response of habitat within stands of varying levels of pine and hardwood basal area under an uneven-aged management regime in southern Mississippi. Summer and winter trends in understory biomass were similar across treatments. Time since disturbance influenced plant productivity. Stands with lower basal areas tended to have higher browse production, denser and higher vertical habitat structure, more woody, vine, and fern biomass, greater total biomass, and higher plant species diversity and richness. Pine basal area had little influence on browse production relative to effects of hardwood basal area. Although stands with higher basal area had less biomass, a higher proportion of biomass was composed of preferred browse. We recommend that forest managers create stands of varying levels of pine and hardwood basal areas to provide for diverse needs of many wildlife species.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Basal area is an important descriptor of forests and a powerful predictor in the study of animal-vegetation interactions.
“Tree size and stem density are important characteristics of overall forest structure. These related metrics can be jointly expressed as basal area, or the proportion of the sampled area taken up by woody stems, which has become known as both an important descriptor of forests in botanical works and as a powerful predictor in the study of animal-vegetation interactions (Dealy, 1985; Holdo, 2007;”
From Fine-scale habitat requirements of the pygmy hippopotamus (Choeropsis liberiensis): Implications for rainforest conservation in West Africa (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 1999
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 10 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Miller, D. A., Leopold, B. D., Conner, L. M., & Shelton, M. G.
- Affiliations
- US Forest Service (US)
- Venue
- Southern Journal of Applied Forestry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1999-08-01
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 151-157
- ISSN
- 0148-4419 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3754
- OpenAlex
- W2399850000
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Southern Journal of Applied Forestry (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Mississippi State University
- U.S. Forest Service
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Forest ecology and management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Keywords
- uneven-aged silviculture, basal area, wildlife habitat, understory biomass, habitat structure, plant diversity, time since disturbance, southern Mississippi
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review