Cited by 86Sleep and related disordersSleep and Wakefulness ResearchPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The beneficial effects of one treatment session and recording of nightmares on chronic nightmare sufferers

Edward J. Neidhardt, Barry J. Krakow, Robert Kellner, Dorothy R. Pathak·1992·SLEEP

Abstract

Twenty subjects with chronic nightmares for 17.2 years mean duration were randomly divided into two groups: Rehearsal and Recording. At inception, subjects in both groups were instructed to write down their nightmares for one month. The Recording group received no other intervention. Rehearsal subjects received a single treatment group session teaching an imagery rehearsal technique to reduce nightmare frequency. At inception and three months follow-up, both groups were compared for nightmare frequency and for self-rated distress with scales (Symptom Checklist and Symptom Questionnaire) measuring anxiety, depression, hostility, somatization and total distress. Nightmare frequency decreased significantly in both groups: Rehearsal group-7.2 per month to 2.0 per month (72% reduction) (p < 0.006); Recording group-9.4 per month to 5.0 per month (47% reduction) (p < 0.02). There were no statistically significant differences in the nightmare frequency reductions between groups. All anxiety, depression, somatization, hostility and total distress scores decreased substantially in the Rehearsal group. Most changes were significant. Changes in the Recording group were inconsistent and not significant. Two brief case histories are presented.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/15.5.470

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Awareness of one's own dream contents and the possibility of altering them may be beneficial for nightmare sufferers.

    “Interestingly, the idea that the awareness of our own dream contents and the possibility of altering them may be beneficial for nightmare sufferers has been proposed by earlier studies (Kellner et al., 1992; Neidhardt et al., 1992; Krakow et al., 2001).”

    From The Functional Role of Dreaming in Emotional Processes (2019) · cites this paper as Neidhardt et al., 1992

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Neidhardt, E. J., Krakow, B. J., Kellner, R., & Pathak, D. R.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Venue
SLEEP
Published
1992-09-01
Volume
15
Issue
5
Pages
470-3
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2439939329
Cited by
86
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 7
FWCI
2.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
nightmare frequency, imagery rehearsal therapy, psychological distress, anxiety, depression, somatization, hostility, sleep disorders
MeSH terms
Adult, Anxiety, Depression, Desensitization, Psychologic, Dreams, Female, Hostility, Humans, Imagination, Male, Middle Aged, Polysomnography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review