Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 34Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSleep and related disordersTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sleep disturbances after pediatric traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of prevalence, risk factors, and association with recovery

Luther, Madison, Poppert Cordts, Katrina M, Williams, Cydni N·2020·Sleep

Abstract

Study Objectives: Sleep is vital for brain development and healing after injury, placing children with sleep-wake disturbances (SWD) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) at risk for worse outcomes. We conducted a systematic review to quantify SWD after pediatric TBI including prevalence, phenotypes, and risk factors. We also evaluated interventions for SWD and the association between SWD and other posttraumatic outcomes. Methods: Systematic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and reference lists for English language articles published from 1999 to 2019 evaluating sleep or fatigue in children hospitalized for mild complicated, moderate, or severe TBI. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias using the Newcastle–Ottowa Score for observational studies. Results: Among 966 articles identified in the search, 126 full-text articles were reviewed, and 24 studies were included (11 prospective, 9 cross-sectional, and 4 case studies). Marked heterogeneity was found in study populations, measures defining SWD, and time from injury to evaluation. Studies showed at least 20% of children with TBI had trouble falling or staying asleep, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, and nightmares. SWD are negatively correlated with posttraumatic cognitive, behavioral, and quality of life outcomes. No comparative intervention studies were identified. The risk of bias was moderate–high for all studies often related to lack of validated or objective SWD measures and small sample size. Heterogeneity precluded meta-analyses. Conclusions: SWD are important morbidities after pediatric TBI, though current data are limited. SWD have implications for TBI recovery and may represent a modifiable target for improving outcomes after pediatric TBI.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/zsaa083

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Show all 51 references

Cited by

See all 34

Metadata

Authors
Luther, M., Poppert Cordts, K. M., & Williams, C. N.
Affiliations
  • Oregon Health & Science University (US)
  • Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE
Venue
Sleep
Published
2020-04-24
Volume
43
Issue
10
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W3018210770
Cited by
34
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS022981)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
sleep disorders, pediatric traumatic brain injury, sleep-wake disturbances, fatigue, daytime sleepiness, nightmares, prevalence, risk factors, cognitive outcomes, behavioral effects, quality of life, sleep interventions
MeSH terms
Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Sleep, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.