Cited by 66Sleep and Wakefulness ResearchSleep and related disordersPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

Sexsomnia: A Specialized Non-REM Parasomnia?

Anne‐Laure Dubessy, Smaranda Leu‐Semenescu, Valérie Attali, Jean‐Baptiste Maranci, Isabelle Arnulf·2016·Sleep

Abstract

Introduction To describe patients with sexsomnia and to contrast their clinical and sleep measures with those of healthy controls and sleepwalkers. Aims and methods Subjects referred for sexsomnia and for sleepwalking/night terror were interviewed, completed the Paris Arousal Disorder Severity Scale (PADSS), and were monitored 1-2 nights with video-polysomnography. Results Seventeen patients (70.6% male, aged 17-76 years) had sexsomnia, with amnestic fondling of the bed partner (n = 11), complete sexual intercourse (n = 8), masturbation (n = 8), and spontaneous orgasm (n = 1). The sexual behaviors were more direct during sleep than during wakefulness (n = 12), leading to 6 sexual assaults, including intra-conjugal rape (n = 3), assault of a family member (n = 2), rape of a friend (n = 1), and forensic consequences (n = 2). In 47% of sexsomnia patients, there was a history or current occurrences of sleepwalking/night terrors. Patients with sexsomnia had more N3 awakenings than healthy matched controls and the same amount as regular sleepwalkers. Half of them presented evidence of cortico-cortical dissociation, including concomitant slow (mostly frontal) and rapid (mostly temporal and occipital) electroencephalography (EEG) rhythms, with concomitant N3 penile erection in 1 case. Of 89 sleepwalkers, 10% had previous episodes of amnestic sexual behaviors, with a higher PADSS-A score and a trend of a higher total PADSS score than the 80 sleepwalkers without sexsomnia. Conclusion I…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/zsw043

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dubessy, A., Leu‐Semenescu, S., Attali, V., Maranci, J., & Arnulf, I.
Affiliations
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR)
Venue
Sleep
Published
2016-12-10
Volume
40
Issue
2
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2560128356
Cited by
66
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 2
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
Keywords
sexsomnia, parasomnias, sleepwalking, night terrors, sexual assault, EEG rhythms, penile erection
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Sexual Behavior, Sex Offenses, Sleep, REM, Somnambulism, Case-Control Studies, Polysomnography, Night Terrors, Parasomnias, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review