Cited by 14Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNeuroscience of respiration and sleepSleep and related disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Is there a threshold that triggers cortical arousals in obstructive sleep apnea

Open access

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To determine whether there is a consistent epiglottic pressure value that predicts respiratory arousal from sleep. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with obstructive sleep apnea underwent overnight polysomnography while instrumented with an epiglottic catheter to measure airway pressures. Nadir epiglottic pressures during respiration events (obstructive apneas/hypopneas) terminated with or without arousals were compared. The events were selected by two methods, (1) 20 events with/without arousals were randomly selected, and (2) Events were sampled in pairs (one terminated with arousal and one without arousal) to minimize the effect of sleep duration/stage on the measurement. RESULTS: A total of 1,317 respiratory events were analyzed. There was substantial variability in nadir epiglottic pressure within an individual and among different individuals. The average pressure of 20 randomly selected events with arousals was (-21.2 ± 11.2, ranged -6.68 to -63.34 cm H2O). The nadir epiglottic pressure during respiratory events in NREM stage 2 sleep terminated with arousals was more negative compared with those terminated without arousals using both sampling methods (-23.5 vs. -18.5 cm H2O, p = 0.007 and -20.3 vs. -16.3 cm H2O, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: There were very different levels of epiglottic pressures that preceded arousals within and among individuals. However, cortical arousals are associated with a level of more negative epiglottic pressure compared to events terminated without arousal, findings which support the concept of a respiratory arousal threshold. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study used existing data to study methodology (from clinical trial "The Impact of Arousal Threshold in Obstructive Sleep Apnea" https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02264353) and it is not a clinical trial.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sleep/zsz047

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some data suggest that a low arousal threshold may be a risk factor for failure of upper airway surgery to achieve a surgical cure.

    “Some data suggest that a low arousal threshold may be a risk factor for failure of UA surgery to achieve a surgical cure.”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [416]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says a low arousal threshold might predispose patients to repetitive apnea rather than stable breathing. That supports the proposed physiological risk, but the paper does not address whether a low threshold predicts failure of upper-airway surgery to achieve a cure. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, Y., Orr, J., Jen, R., Sands, S. A., DeYoung, P., Smales, E., Edwards, B., Owens, R. L., & Malhotra, A.
Affiliations
  • Beijing Tongren Hospital (CN)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Malhotra, Atul
Venue
Sleep
Published
2019-02-22
Volume
42
Issue
6
ISSN
  • 0161-8105 (ISSN-L)
  • 1550-9109
OpenAlex
W2916853473
Cited by
14
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SLEEP (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (R01 HL085188, K24 HL132105)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, cortical arousal, arousal threshold, airway pressure, sleep-disordered breathing
MeSH terms
Adult, Arousal, Epiglottis, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Respiration, Sleep Stages, Polysomnography, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review