Cited by 123Critical Race Theory in EducationSocial Movements and Cultural IdentityRace, History, and American Society

Racialized Equity Labor, University Appropriation and Student Resistance

Lerma, Veronica, Hamilton, Laura T, Nielsen, Kelly·2020·Social Problems

Abstract

We coin the term “racialized equity labor” to describe the often uncompensated efforts of people of color to address systematic racism and racial marginalization within organizations. Using a year-long ethnographic and interview study of a majority-minority public university, we focus specifically on the racialized equity labor of college students who, like many faculty and staff of color, often labor to make their campuses comfortable and functional for historically underrepresented populations. We identify a cycle of racialized labor appropriation whereby: 1) people of color identify problems in the racial environment of their organizations and work to solve them; 2) leadership responds by blocking efforts and/or denying issues; 3) external and/or internal pressures force introspection and push leaders to resolve an organizational threat (e.g., to the university’s public image of diversity); and finally, 4) leadership appropriates racialized equity labor, and in doing so converts it into a diluted diversity initiative. Those engaged in racialized equity labor may resist appropriation, but the cycle takes a toll on activists. The ways in which organizations respond to racialized equity labor offers insight into the reproduction of racial inequities, despite the hard work of people of color to create meaningful racial change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/socpro/spz011

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 48 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lerma, V., Hamilton, L. T., & Nielsen, K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Merced (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Lerma, Veronica
Venue
Social Problems
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
67
Issue
2
Pages
286-303
ISSN
  • 0037-7791 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-8533
OpenAlex
W2946393136
Cited by
123
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 15 · 2018: 1
FWCI
22.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Problems (publishedVersion)
Funders
William T. Grant Scholars
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Critical Race Theory in Education
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Movements and Cultural Identity
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Race, History, and American Society
Keywords
student resistance, public universities, people of color, systemic racism, racial marginalization, diversity initiatives, racial inequity, campus diversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review