Cited by 234Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsQualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsSocial Work Education and Practice

The Eye Regards Itself: Benefits and Challenges of Reflexivity in Qualitative Social Work Research

Probst, B.·2015·Social Work Research

Abstract

Much has been written about the central role of reflexivity in qualitative research, yet there has been no empirical study of how researchers actually practice reflexivity and what it is like for them to do so. To address this question, a project was developed to gather information directly from qualitative social work researchers about the perceived benefits, challenges, and limitations of reflexivity. Participants, representing eight countries with the majority (65%) from the United States, included researchers using diverse methods with varying degrees of experience. In their interviews, these 34 scholars discussed the benefits of reflexive activities for both themselves and their research projects; obstacles that were personal, project-related, professional, and systemic; a discrepancy between valuation and actual use of reflexive practices; and the need to balance flexibility and rigor. The article concludes with directions for further inquiry and suggestions for assessing the adequacy of reflexivity in published studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/swr/svu028

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Probst, B.
Affiliations
Smith College (US)
Corresponding author
Probst, B.
Venue
Social Work Research
Published
2015-01-14
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
37-48
ISSN
  • 1070-5309 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-6838
OpenAlex
W2013102148
Cited by
234
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
23.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Work Research (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
Keywords
reflexivity, qualitative research, researcher self-awareness, researcher experience, research rigor, researcher perspectives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review