Cited by 109Qualitative Research Methods and EthicsSocial Work Education and PracticeQualitative Research Methods and Applications

Challenging perspectives: Reflexivity as a critical approach to qualitative social work research

Open access
Ide, Yayoi, Beddoe, Liz·2024·Qualitative Social Work

Abstract

Reflexivity is acknowledged as a crucial concept and is pivotal in the methodology of qualitative research. Various practices of reflexivity are adopted in the social science disciplines. However, the concept is difficult to pin down and the challenge for researchers is to address how to become reflexive and do reflexivity in research practice. In social work, reflexivity has further been developed and applied in practice contexts. The practice terms, critical reflection and reflection or reflectivity are interrelated in ways that aim to explain reflexivity in the profession which, in turn, can offer an enhanced understanding of reflexivity applied in research. This exploratory article promotes practising reflection – questioning, analysing and evaluating oneself in employing reflexivity in all the research stages: methodological construction, data collection and data analysis by undertaking three key self-focused activities: (1) thinking about one’s own thinking; (2) observation of emotions/thoughts, role boundaries and power dynamics in research relationships; and (3) exploration of perceptual experiences. Maintaining the reflexive stance is achieved through reflectivity. The article is largely descriptive but draws on experience in a doctoral study of cultural competence and promotes the effective use of reflexivity in qualitative social work research.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

This exploratory article argues that reflexivity in qualitative social work research can be enacted through reflection across methodological construction, data collection, and data analysis, using three self-focused activities. Drawing on the first author’s PhD study of cultural competence development, it illustrates how reflexivity can surface assumptions, emotions, positioning, and power dynamics, while noting that reflexivity is difficult, time-consuming, and not a natural skill.

Key findings

  • Reflexivity is hard to pin down, and the article proposes practising reflection—questioning, analysing, and evaluating oneself—through three self-focused activities: (1) thinking about one’s own thinking; (2) observing emotions/thoughts, role boundaries, and power dynamics in research relationships; and (3) exploring perceptual experiences.
  • Reflection/reflectivity is presented as a prerequisite for reflexivity; in data analysis, the author describes a subject-object-subject analysis, illustrated through re-examining Māori participants’ meanings of cultural competence and the researcher’s own interpretations.
  • In the first author’s doctoral study, recruitment did not set specific categorised groups; participants came from diverse backgrounds identifying with at least 10 different cultural and race/ethnic groups. Reflexivity revealed fluid insider/outsider positioning and power differentials, and the author states that reflexivity might not be a method of managing power imbalance.
  • The article concludes that both reflectivity and reflexivity are needed to understand participants’ experiences and one’s own, and that reflexivity can awaken consciousness of the researcher’s subjective/personal involvement in research.

Methods

  • Exploratory, largely descriptive article drawing on the first author’s PhD study of cultural competence development (Ide, 2021), with the second author as supervisor; ethical approval was received from the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee on 4 June 2015.
  • The study used qualitative research stages—methodological construction, data collection, and data analysis—and drew on critical realism (Bhaskar, 1978) and social constructionist perspectives.
  • The article illustrates reflexivity through the first author’s research journals, notes, and interview examples, including interviews with student participants and Māori social workers; no formal sample size or systematic analysis procedure is reported.

Limitations

  • The paper states that reflexivity is not a natural skill but can be improved by education and training; it is time-consuming, researchers may not always have enough time for adequate reflection, and the process can involve emotional challenges such as discomfort, frustration, and vulnerability.
  • The paper also states that how awareness and/or insight emerges from reflexivity is not well known, necessary techniques may not be clear, reflexivity can be considered too subjective and lead to questioning validity, and reflexivity might not manage power imbalance.
  • Evident from the text: the article is largely descriptive and based on one doctoral study, with examples drawn from the first author’s reflections rather than a systematic empirical evaluation of the proposed three activities; participant sample size and formal analytic procedures are not reported.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14733250231173522

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

3 of 33 cited sources checked · 3 supported · 0 flagged

  • Premisecitation

    The subject-object-subject analysis (reflexivity) acknowledges the influence of subjective knowledge.

    “The subject-object-subject analysis (reflexivity) acknowledges the influence of subjective knowledge: '[the] reflexive approach does form the basis for such crucial conceptual functions as personal meaning, interpersonal and interpretive understanding, and accurate empathy as a way of knowing self and other' (Kondrat, 1999: 458).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kondrat, 1999 source
  • Findingown data

    The first author's decisions over recruitment partially resulted from her feelings of being left out of both Japanese and New Zealand groups.

    “In the reflection, I acknowledged that my decisions over recruitment partially resulted from my feelings of being left out of both (Japanese and New Zealand) groups.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The first author found that researcher reflexivity is an ethical research process important in addressing power differentials by increasing awareness of the power dynamics that exist in researcher-participant relationships.

    “I found that researcher reflexivity is an ethical research process important in addressing power differentials by increasing awareness of the power dynamics that exist in researcher-participant relationships.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The first author's insider status did not have a positive impact on the relationship by the end of the interview with the participant.

    “From the previous example, my insider status did not have a positive impact on the relationship by the end of the interview with the participant.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The first author was challenged by Maori social workers who redirected questions about culture and cross-cultural social work practice back to her.

    “Another example from my study occurred when I was interviewing several M aori (indigenous people of New Zealand) social workers.I was challenged as they redirected questions about culture and cross-cultural social work practice back to me.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 84
  • May combine two claims. 30
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The concept stems from the Western philosophical tradition, George Herbert Mead's classic distinction between the 'I' and the 'me': reflective self-awareness distinguishes between the subject-self 'I' (knower) and the object-self 'me' (known) in reflection.

    “The concept stems from the Western philosophical tradition, George Herbert Mead's classic distinction between the 'I' and the 'me': reflective self-awareness distinguishes between the subject-self 'I' (knowerthe reflecting aspect of the self) and the object-self 'me' (knownthe self as reflected on) in reflection (Kondrat, 1999).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kondrat, 1999 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Kondrat (1999) asserts that 'subjective' is used in a pejorative term (such as contaminated or biased), but it is a way of knowing something in its own right.

    “However, Kondrat (1999) asserts that 'subjective' is used in a pejorative term (such as contaminated or biased), but it is a way of knowing something in its own right.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Kondrat, 1999 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The first author unconsciously and unintentionally avoided categorising any participant's identity as singular due to experiencing her cultural identity as changeable.

    “In another reflection, I realised that I, unconsciously and unintentionally, avoided categorising any participant's identity as singular due to experiencing my cultural identity as changeable (being a minority Japanese in New Zealand and being a majority Japanese (however, I am often seen/perceived as an outsider) in Japan) by moving between different contexts.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The first author's decision-making for research recruitment was spontaneous, without conscious thought.

    “However, my decision-making for this research recruitment was spontaneous, without conscious thought.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In focussing on broad generalisability among the group, the first author might have overlooked the unique experiences of individuals.

    “In focussing on broad generalisability among the group I might have overlooked the unique experiences of individuals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The first author's engagement in reflexivity was pivotal for her PhD study of cultural competence development.

    “In this article, the occurrence of reflexivity is illustrated through the first author's engagement in reflexivity, which was pivotal for her PhD study of cultural competence development.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The first author lost a strong sense of self or cultural identity when trying to trace these.

    “A significant issue was that I lost a strong sense of self or cultural identity when trying to trace these.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Findingreasoning

    Reflexivity was produced by a reflective process alongside reflection at different stages: methodological construction, data collection and data analysis.

    “Reflexivity was produced by a reflective process alongside reflection at different stages: methodological construction, data collection and data analysis during the research which is illustrated later.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    The first author needed to gain trust from the participants, being Tau iwi, as someone who studies cultural practice.

    “Within this historical and societal context, I needed to gain trust from the participants, being Tau iwi (neither M aori nor P ak eh a (European New Zealander)) as someone who studies cultural practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The first author detached a cultural self-position or maintained a nobody identity while the participant might be her cultural self and considered the author an insider.

    “After this reflection, I also realised that I detached a cultural self-position or maintained a nobody identity, while the participant might be her cultural self and considered the author as insider.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    The first author was not merely given solo privilege as a researcher in this particular context.

    “I was not merely given solo privilege as a researcher in this particular context.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    This note led to questioning the first author about her understanding, what does Other mean to her and herself.

    “This note led to questioning me about my understanding, what does Other mean to her and myself?”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In a particular conversation with one participant, the first author was sympathetic toward her; her response came from the experience of being treated as the Other on some occasions.

    “In a particular conversation with one participant, I was sympathetic toward her.My response came from the experience of being treated as the Other on some occasions.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    In the process, the first author went back and forth between described experiences of participants and her understanding (awareness) of them in reflections.

    “In the process, I went back and forth between described experiences of participants and my understanding (awareness) of them in reflections.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The first author questioned her initial analysis by re-assessing a couple of participants' interviews where participants discussed their uncomfortable experiences of being a Maori person in New Zealand society in answering a question about their understanding and meaning of cultural competence in practice.

    “I questioned my initial analysis by re-assessing a couple of participants' interviews where participants discussed their uncomfortable experiences of being a M aori person in New Zealand society in answering a question about their understanding and meaning of cultural competence in practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingreasoning

    Understanding of the Treaty results in the view involving cultural competence coming from the first author's way of seeing New Zealand society as a multicultural society.

    “Understanding of the Treaty results in the view involving cultural competence coming from my way of seeing New Zealand societyas a multicultural society.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The first author's subject-object analysis then shifted to how the participants perceive their world, analysing data by use of the subject 'I'.

    “My subject-object analysis then shifted to how the participants perceive their world, analysing data by use of the subject 'I'.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Those participants' central focus regarding cultural competence was seemingly related to the historical issues-Maori colonisation and oppression.

    “Those participants' central focus regarding cultural competence was seemingly related to the historical issues -M aori colonisation and oppression.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In the subject-object-subject analysis, the first author acknowledged the 'different' realities between us and was reflexive in perceiving their meaning differently-if participants see New Zealand's colonial history as continuously affecting the present, not the past.

    “In the subject-object-subject analysis, I acknowledged the 'different' realities between us and I was reflexive in perceiving their meaning differentlyif participants see New Zealand's colonial history as continuously affecting the present, not the past.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The first author left a note in her research journal: 'is there something that I misunderstood and or mis-interpreted here? [The participant] looked nonplussed.'

    “However, I left a note in my research journal: 'is there something that I misunderstood and or mis-interpreted here?[The participant] looked nonplussed.'”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The first author more likely accepts the 'Other' status from her understanding of being the Other from where she stands as a migrant, and this needed to be differentiated from what the Maori participants saw, and how they experienced their reality, as it depends on where they stand.

    “I more likely accept the 'Other' status from my understanding of being the Other from where I stand as a migrant, and this needed to be differentiated from what the M aori participants saw, and how they experienced their reality, as it depends on where they stand.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    The first author's first analysis of Maori participants' meanings of cultural competence based on their words in texts and transcripts suggests the support of Maori people and culture in social work practice.

    “My first analysis of M aori participants' meanings of cultural competence based on their words in texts and transcripts suggest the support of M aori people and culture in social work practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    Reflectivity alongside reflection, which is a step toward reflexivity exploring and elaborating in social work, guided the author in the process of reflexivity.

    “Reflectivity alongside reflection, which is a step toward reflexivity exploring and elaborating in social work, guided the author in the process of reflexivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    In this article, the core of reflexivity, conscious self-awareness, drew attention to the occurrence and integration of it into the first author's research.

    “In this article, the core of reflexivity, conscious self-awareness drew attention to the occurrence and integration of it into the first author's research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    Eventually, the first author transformed the analysed information into some form of knowledge.

    “Eventually, I transformed the analysed information into some form of knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingnone given

    The examples in this article demonstrate that evocative questions have emerged from the first author's research journals and notes.

    “The examples in this article demonstrate that evocative questions have emerged from the first author's research journals and notes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Research is a deliberative process; however, decision-making is not completely consciously based on rational thinking and logical reasoning.

    “Research is a deliberative process; however, decision-making is not completely consciously based on rational thinking and logical reasoning.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reflexivity in thinking helps to understand what one knows and how one knows, including one's perspectives and assumptions about the world and how self-influence has affected the formation of the research.

    “Reflexivity in thinking helps to understand what I know and how I knowwhat are my perspectives and assumptions about the world and how my self-influence (including my emotions) has either intentionally, or unintentionally, affected the formation of the research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reflexivity can be a critical lens in the researcher-participant relationship (in relation to power) through reflective practice.

    “Reflexivity can be a critical lens in the researcher-participant relationship (in relation to power) through reflective practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The research received ethical approval from the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee on 4 June 2015.

    “The research received ethical approval from the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee on 4 June 2015.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    Reflexivity is a crucial concept and pivotal in qualitative research methodology.

    “Reflexivity is acknowledged as a crucial concept and is pivotal in the methodology of qualitative research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Finlay, 2002 source
    • cites Houston, 2015 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reflexivity can be implemented by undertaking three self-focused activities: thinking about one's own thinking; observing emotions/thoughts, role boundaries and power dynamics in research relationships; and exploring perceptual experiences.

    “This exploratory article promotes practising reflectionquestioning, analysing and evaluating oneself in employing reflexivity in all the research stages: methodological construction, data collection and data analysis by undertaking three key self-focused activities: (1) thinking about one's own thinking; (2) observation of emotions/thoughts, role boundaries and power dynamics in research relations”
    • Also stated in: § Introduction · plain
      “Reflexivity can be implemented by undertaking three, self-focused activities: (1) thinking about one's own thinking; (2) observing emotions and thoughts, role boundaries and power dynamics in the research relationship; and (3) exploring perceptual experiences.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Maintaining the reflexive stance is achieved through reflectivity.

    “Maintaining the reflexive stance is achieved through reflectivity.”
    • Also stated in: § Reflexivity as applied in social work practice · plain
      “A reflexive stance is contributed to by a process of reflectivity (Fook, 2016).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Fook, 2016

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reflexivity can still be obscure in relation to what reflexivity is, and how to be reflexive or do reflexivity in research.

    “Hence reflexivity can still be obscure in relation to what reflexivity is, and how to be reflexive or do reflexivity in research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reflection is a prerequisite and entails analysing, evaluating and questioning oneself in the reflexive process.

    “Reflection is a prerequisite and entails analysing, evaluating and questioning oneself in the reflexive process.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The process of reflexivity is time-consuming, and researchers may not always have enough time for adequate reflection.

    “Also, the process of reflexivity is time-consuming, researchers may not always have enough time for adequate reflection (Probst and Berenson, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Probst and Berenson, 2014 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Two distinct cultures-an indigenous Maori culture and a largely Anglo-European New Zealand national culture-co-exist, often uncomfortably, within the society, incorporating values and traditions of both cultures and reflecting customs, laws, practices and institutional arrangements.

    “Two distinct cultures: an indigenous M aori culture and a largely Anglo-European New Zealand national culture, co-exist, often uncomfortably, within the society, incorporating the values and traditions of both cultures and reflecting this society's customs, laws, practices and institutional arrangements (Eketone and Walker, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eketone and Walker, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The profession aspires to bicultural practice based on The Treaty of Waitangi, a partnership between various tribes of Maori and the British Crown signed in 1840.

    “The profession aspires to bicultural practice, based on The Treaty of Waitangi (henceforth, in M aori language Te Tiriti o Waitangi), which is a partnership between various tribes of M aori and the British Crown signed in 1840 (Eketone and Walker, 2015;Ruwhiu, 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Eketone and Walker, 2015 source
    • cites Ruwhiu, 2013

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    New Zealand social work has increasingly focused on its colonial origins as a British colony with significant European settlement in the 19th century.

    “New Zealand social work has increasingly focused on its colonial origins as a British colony with significant European settlement in the 19th century (Beddoe, 2018).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beddoe, 2018 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reflexivity implies emancipatory practice, which is an inspection of professional knowledge and practice in relation to power.

    “Firstly, reflexivity implies emancipatory practice, which is an inspection of professional knowledge and practice in relation to power (D ' Cruz et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites D ' Cruz et al., 2007

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reflexivity seemingly brings researchers' subconsciousness into awareness.

    “Reflexivity seemingly brings researchers' subconsciousness into awareness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    Reflexivity reveals researcher-participant power differentials and unequalised power, not only in the immediate interviewing context but also in wider social and cultural contexts.

    “Reflexivity reveals researcher-participant power differentials and unequalised power, not only in the immediate interviewing context but also in wider social and cultural contexts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisereasoning

    The study of culture or related to culture was a sensitive issue and an area of expertise for Maori people due to ongoing struggle for recognition and rights due to colonisation.

    “The study of culture or related to culture was a sensitive issue as well as an area of expertise on the topic for M aori people due to the ongoing struggle for their recognition and rights due to the country's history of colonisation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Reflexivity often focuses on privileged researchers, though it is not always the case.

    “Reflexivity often focuses (becoming aware of power) on privileged researchers.However, it is not always the case.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Reflexivity has become significant in the production of qualitative research, but the necessary techniques may not be clear.

    “On the other hand, while reflexivity has become significant in the production of qualitative research, the necessary techniques may not be clear (Day, 2012), and it can be considered too subjective (Finlay, 2002) leading to questioning the validity of the research.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Day, 2012 source
    • cites Finlay, 2002 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reflexive researchers are encouraged to manage power differences by empowering and collaborating with research participants.

    “Reflexive researchers are encouraged to manage power differences by empowering and collaborating with research participants (Day, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Day, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The capability of reflection on a deeper level is crucial for reflexivity; however, it is seldom mentioned in the research field.

    “The capability of reflection on a deeper level is crucial for reflexivity; however, it is seldom mentioned in the research field (Mortari, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mortari, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Reflectivity involved inter/intrapersonal dimensions in reflection assist being reflexive/doing reflexively.

    “Reflectivity involved inter/intrapersonal dimensions in reflection assist being reflexive/doing reflexively.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Researcher's reflexivity, which entails reflection on the process of knowledge production and meaning-making based on theoretical (as well as personal) assumptions, is indispensable.

    “Thus, researcher's reflexivity, which entails reflection on the process of knowledge production and meaning-making based on theoretical (as well as personal) assumptions is indispensable.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Reflexivity involves an observation of the power imbalance between researcher and participant.

    “Furthermore, reflexivity involves an observation of the power imbalance between researcher and participant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Day, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The process forms a dichotomy between the knower of self (subject) and the self as known (object) in reflection.

    “The process forms a dichotomy between the knower of self (subject) and the self as known (object) in reflection (Yan and Wong, 2005).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Yan and Wong, 2005 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationnone given

    Reflexivity in thinking and observing has presented as understanding oneself (assumptions, emotions, self-location and positioning) that leads to recognising others.

    “As previously illustrated, reflexivity in thinking and observing has presented as understanding oneself (assumptions, emotions, self-location and positioning) that leads to recognising others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Reflexivity might not be a method of managing power imbalance.

    “However, reflexivity might not be a method of managing power imbalance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Fixed researcher positionality is problematic because a person cannot be completely outside or inside, as the researcher is flexible in insider-outsider positioning.

    “Fixed researcher positionality is problematic as any person cannot be completely outside or inside as the researcher is flexible in their insider-outsider positioning (Eppley, 2006;Hallawell, 2006).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Eppley, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

    • cites Hallawell, 2006

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The role of subject who reflects and the object which is reflected-that is, the subject becomes the object of the analysis.

    “The role of subject who reflects and the object which is reflectedthat is, the subject becomes the object of the analysis (Mortari, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mortari, 2015 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Power is not intrinsically held by persons but by peoples and groups; they are positioned differently within power structures, and power is not equally distributed.

    “Power is not something that is intrinsically held by persons but by peoples and groups; they are positioned differently within power structures, and power is not equally distributed (Day, 2012).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Day, 2012 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reflection entails a subject-object analysis or subject 'I' analysis.

    “Reflection entails a subject-object analysis or subject 'I' analysis as Finlay (2002) mentioned.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Finlay, 2002 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Researchers are able to recognise and address the assumptions and preconceptions that may affect knowledge production and the process through reflexivity.

    “They are able to recognise and address the assumptions and preconceptions that may affect knowledge production and the process.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The process is a source of insight through becoming more reflexive.

    “The process is a source of insight through becoming more reflexive (Figure 1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisenone given

    The subject-object analysis is an objective analysis of self in reflection.

    “The subject-object analysis is an objective analysis of self in reflection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Making oneself the object of self-inquiry becomes the subject of his or her experience.

    “Making oneself the object of self-inquiry becomes the subject of his or her experience (Mortari, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mortari, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Understanding a researcher's perceived reality can expand their thinking about others' perceived reality, while these realities may not be identical.

    “For instance, understanding a researcher's perceived reality can expand their thinking about others' perceived reality, while these realities may not be identical.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    New Zealand could not claim to be multicultural because government institutions and policies only accommodate one, or at best two, cultural ways of being, knowing, valuing, and doing.

    “'With this view, New Zealand could not claim to be multicultural because government institutions and policies only accommodate one, or at best two, cultural ways of being, knowing, valuing, and doing' (Eketone and Walker, 2015: 108).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eketone and Walker, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    Since the ideas of social constructionism have been absorbed into social work and practice, social workers' reflexivity can be more attentive to such things as reflective practice, interpreting clients' problems and knowledge in/of practice.

    “Since the ideas of social constructionism have been absorbed into social work and practice, social workers' reflexivity can be more attentive to such things as reflective practice, interpreting clients' problems and knowledge in/of practice.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Reflexivity is not a natural skill but one which can be improved by education and training.

    “Reflexivity is, however, not a natural skill but one which can be improved by education and training (Mortari, 2015).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Mortari, 2015 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationnone given

    The first author's perception of the world and subjective knowledge is essential for understanding experiences of Others and interpreting the participants' realities.

    “My perception of the world and subjective knowledge is essential for understanding experiences of Others and interpreting the participants' realities.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    A reflexive researcher can consider participants' perception of the world by recognising their self-view influence.

    “A reflexive researcher can consider participants' perception of the world by recognising their self-view influence.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    Reflexivity is a post-examination of the subject-object analysis by the subject 'I' (the knower).

    “Reflexivity is a post-examination of the subject-object analysis by the subject 'I' (the knower).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Reflexivity can awaken the consciousness of the researcher's subjective/personal involvement in research.

    “Reflexivity can awaken the consciousness of the researcher's subjective/personal involvement in research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisenone given

    Reflexivity involves exploring and examining perceptual experience-how we perceive participant (and researcher) experiences.

    “Reflexivity involves exploring and examining perceptual experienceshow we perceive participant (and researcher) experiences.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    These provide an initial mapping of a researcher's own thinking and observe any changes from the beginning, middle and end of the research.

    “These provide an initial mapping of a researcher's own thinking and observe any changes from the beginning, middle and end of the research (Pillow, 2010).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pillow, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Eketone and Walker explain that, in a multicultural society, it is often understood that non-dominant cultural groups are not fully accommodated-they live under the country's laws and customs within a society in which a power dynamic is generated where the privileged in the society maintain monoculturalism.

    “Eketone and Walker (2015) explain that, in a multicultural society, it is often understood that non-dominant cultural groups are not fully accommodatedthey live under the country's laws and customs within a society in which a power dynamic is generated where the privileged in the society maintain monoculturalism.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eketone and Walker, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Such reflection focuses more on emotions and thoughts towards interpretations about reality/experience of that subject and may exclude comparing different interpretations and discussing interpretations behind these interpretations.

    “However, such reflection focuses more on emotions and thoughts towards interpretations about reality/experience of that subject and may exclude comparing different interpretationsand discussing interpretations behind these interpretations.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).

    Interpretationnone given

    In qualitative research, reflexivity enables researchers to recognise their presence and particular ways of seeing and thinking and acknowledging that what they see influences how they see their world and others.

    “In qualitative research, reflexivity enables researchers to recognise their presence and particular ways of seeing and thinking and acknowledging that what they see influences how they see their world and others.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Reflexivity can include that, although it may not occur spontaneously.

    “Reflexivity can include that, although it may not occur spontaneously.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Premisecitation

    The process is vital as we tend to see others from our (different/privileged) standpoint.

    “The process is vital as we tend to see others from our (different/privileged) standpoint.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    The outcomes of reflexivity bring insights such as new thoughts or understandings about how the reality(ies) between the two can be constructed and adjusted through the researcher's internal dialogue.

    “The outcomes of reflexivity bring insights such as new thoughts or understandings about how the reality(ies) between the two can be constructed and adjusted through the researcher's internal dialogue.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Aotearoa New Zealand uniquely recognises biculturalism stemming from Te Tiriti o Waitangi, a formal, political, social and cultural structure within the country coexists between two cultures.

    “On the other hand, Aotearoa New Zealand uniquely recognises biculturalism stemming from Te Tiriti o Waitangi, a formal, political, social and cultural structure within the country coexists between two cultures.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Eketone and Walker, 2015 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    Researchers' understanding of their world, participants' views of their world, and then addressing and comparing differences by recognising the influence of the researcher's self-view can bring together each other's knowledge and experiences in creating new knowledge.

    “Researchers' understanding of their world, participants' views of their world, and then addressing and comparing differences by recognising the influence of the researcher's self-view can bring together each other's knowledge and experiences in creating new knowledge.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    If participants see New Zealand's colonial history as continuously affecting the present, not the past, their strong resistance to one dominant culture in social work practice by embracing their culture makes much sense.

    “If so, their strong resistance to one dominant culture in social work practice by embracing their culture makes much sense.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Premisenone given

    Reflexivity is often perceived as uncertainty due to its construction within various theoretical frameworks and, as a result, there are several practices of it in research.

    “Reflexivity is often perceived as uncertainty due to its construction within various theoretical frameworks and, as a result, there are several practices of it in research.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Pillow (2010) strongly suggests that researchers, in particular novice researchers, consistently keep researcher logs, field notes and journals.

    “Pillow (2010) strongly suggests that researchers, in particular novice researchers, consistently keep researcher logs, field notes and journals.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Pillow, 2010

      Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).

    Interpretationreasoning

    We need both reflectivity and reflexivity for understanding and interpretation of the experiences of participants as well as our own.

    “Therefore, we need both reflectivity and reflexivity for understanding and interpretation of the experiences of participants as well as our own.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    The process may be back and forth to check/evaluate the researcher's perception of the world and participants (it can include cross-checking with them).

    “The process may be back and forth to check/evaluate the researcher's perception of the world and participants (it can include cross-checking with them).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    Reflection was crucial for being reflexive and doing reflexivity.

    “Reflection was crucial for being reflexive and doing reflexivity.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    That leads to further reflexivity to review the findings through analysing the process of knowledge the researcher is generating-questioning the interpretation of the Other's lived experience using the researcher's own words and paradigms to present the Other's experience.

    “That leads to further reflexivity to review the findings through analysing the process of knowledge the researcher is generatingquestioning the interpretation of the Other's lived experience using the researcher's own words and paradigms to present the Other's experience.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
86 of 86
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    There is a link between the existing world and perceptions of the world that are not identical.

    “A crucial point is that there is a significant assumption of a link between the existing world and perceptions of the world that are not identical.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    How awareness and/or insight emerges from reflexivity is not well known.

    “However, how such awareness and/ or insight emerges from reflexivity is not well known.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The first author's self-reflections accurately capture her unconscious motivations and experiences.

    “In another reflection, I realised that I, unconsciously and unintentionally, avoided categorising any participant's identity as singular due to experiencing my cultural identity as changeable”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The first author's reflections and research journal notes accurately represent her experiences and internal states during the interviews.

    “However, I left a note in my research journal: 'is there something that I misunderstood and or mis-interpreted here?[The participant] looked nonplussed.'”
    “The examples in this article demonstrate that evocative questions have emerged from the first author's research journals and notes.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The first author's interpretations of participants' meanings and experiences are accurate.

    “My first analysis of M aori participants' meanings of cultural competence based on their words in texts and transcripts suggest the support of M aori people and culture in social work practice.”
    “Those participants' central focus regarding cultural competence was seemingly related to the historical issues -M aori colonisation and oppression.”
5 of 5

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Hellawell's name is spelled differently in citations

    Minor

    The text cites "Hallawell" for a 2006 source, while the corresponding reference-list entry names "Hellawell."

  • D'Cruz citation year differs from the reference list

    Minor

    The text cites D'Cruz and colleagues as a 2007 source, but the corresponding reference-list entry is dated 2005.

2 of 2

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. ANZASW, 2019, Code of Ethics

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ide, Y., & Beddoe, L.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Ide, Yayoi
Venue
Qualitative Social Work
Published
2023-04-28
Volume
23
Issue
4
Pages
725-740
ISSN
  • 1473-3250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1741-3117
OpenAlex
W4367316670
Cited by
105
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 5
FWCI
46.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Qualitative Social Work (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Social Work Education and Practice
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
Keywords
reflexivity, critical reflection, reflectivity, research relationships, power relations, role boundaries, emotions in research, perceptual experience, cultural competence, researcher self-awareness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review