Cited by 71Child Abuse and TraumaSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMilitary, Security, and Education Studies

Child sexual abuse prevention: research review and recommendations

Open access
Berrick, J. D., Barth, R. P.·1992·Social Work Research and Abstracts

Abstract

A vigorous debate has accompanied the dissemination of research findings in the area of child sexual abuse prevention education. The debate has highlighted passionate beliefs but has done little to inform the average reader about the range of studies available in this field. The following research review provides specific information on the methodology and results of more than 30 studies. A metaanalysis offers an overall assessment of the study results. Suggestions for the development of alternative approaches in prevention activities are rendered.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/swra/28.4.6

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Knowledge effect sizes in prior reviews ranged from 0.57 to 1.07.

    “These effect sizes ranged from 0.57 (Heidotting 1994, 18 studies), through 0.71 (Rispens 1997, 16 studies) and 0.90 (Berrick 1992, 13 studies) to 1.07 (Davis 2000, 27 studies).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [4]4. Berrick, J. D., & Gilbert, N. (199\). With the best of intentions: The child sexual abuse prevention movement. New York: Guilford Press.
  2. [7]7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
  3. [12]12. Finkelhor, D., & Strapko, N. (1992). Sexual abuse prevention education: A review of evaluation studies. In D. J. Willis, E. W. Holden, & M. Rosenberg (Eds.), Prevention of child maltreatment (pp. 150--167). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  4. [16]16. Goerge, R., & Wulczyn, F. (1991). Child welfare symposium: A multi--state foster care study. Unpublished monograph, University of Chicago, Chapin Hall Center for Children, Chicago.
  5. [22]22. Kolko, D. 1., Moser, J. T., Litz, 1., & Hughes, J. (1987). Promoting awareness and prevention of child sexual victimization using the Red Flag! Green Flag Program: An evaluation with follow--up. Journal of Family Violence, 2, 11--35.
  6. [26]26. MacFarlane, K, & Waterman, L. (1986). Sexual abuse of young children. New York: Guilford Press.
  7. [27]27. Miltenberger, R G., & Thiesse--Duffy, E. (1988). Evaluation of home--based programs for teaching personal safety skills to children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 21, 81--87.
  8. [28]28. Moskowitz, J. (1989). The primary prevention of alcohol problems. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50, 54--88.
  9. [31]31. Ostbloom, N., Richardson, B., & Galey, M. (1987). Sexual abuse prevention projects. Unpublished manuscript, National Committee for the Prevention of Child Abuse, Iowa Chapter, Des Moines.
  10. [33]33. Poche, C., Brouwer, R, & Swearingen, M. (1981). Teaching self--protection to young children. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 14, 169--175.
  11. [35]35. Rosenthal, R, & Rubin, D. (1982). Further meta--analytic procedures for assessing cognitive gender differences. Journal of Educational Psychology, 74,708--712.
  12. [36]36. Siegel, S. (1956). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-- Hili.
  13. [38]38. Swan, H. L., Press, A. N., & Briggs, S. L. (1985). Child sexual abuse prevention: Does it work? Child Welfare, 64, 395--405.
  14. [42]42. Williams, R, Ward, D., & Gray, L. (1985). The persistence of experimentally induced cognitive change: A neglected dimension in the assessment of drug prevention programs. Journal of Drug Education, 15,33--42.
  15. [43]43. Wilson, G. T. (1985). Limitations of meta--analysis in the evaluation of the effects of psychological therapy. Clinical Psychology Review, 5, 35--47.
  16. [45]45. Woods, S. C, & Dean, K. S. (1985, September). Evaluating sexual abuse prevention strategies. Paper presented at the Seventh National Conference on Child Abuse and Neglect, Chicago.
  17. [47]47. Wurtele, S., Saslawsky, D., Miller, C., Marrs, S., & Britcher, J. (1986). Teaching personal safety skills for potential prevention of sexual abuse: A comparison of treatments. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 54, 688--692.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berrick, J. D., & Barth, R. P.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Venue
Social Work Research and Abstracts
Published
1992-12-01
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
6-15
ISSN
0148-0847 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2328768845
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 7
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Work Research and Abstracts (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Military, Security, and Education Studies
Keywords
child sexual abuse, prevention education, prevention programs, program effectiveness, research dissemination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review