The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fitting the Gene Lineage into its Species Lineage, a Parsimony Strategy Illustrated by Cladograms Constructed from Globin Sequences
Abstract
Fitting the gene lineage into its species lineage, a parsimony strategy illustrated by cladograms constructed from globin sequences. Syst. Zool. 28:132–163.—The gene phylogeny for a set of contemporary species is defined as the ancestral order of branching of evolutionarily related gene lineages leading to the expressed genes in the contemporary species. The species phylogeny for this set of species is defined as the evolutionary branching of species lineages leading to the contemporary species. Since a given gene may duplicate within its species lineage, and distinct sister genes may be expressed by different species, the topologies of the gene and species lineages may not be the same for the same set of contemporary species. The present paper develops a parsimony strategy for scoring the gene duplications and gene expression events needed to fit gene lineages into their corresponding species lineages. In the usual parsimony reconstruction, an effort is made to minimize the number of nucleotide replacements throughout the tree. In the present study, the sum of nucleotide replacements, gene duplications, and gene expression events is the value to be minimized. Gene expression events are further subclassified as gene loss events, activating regulator mutations, and inactivating regulator mutations. Analysis of amino acid sequence data from the alpha and beta hemoglobins and myoglobins suggests that the gene lineages deviate relatively little from established species relationships, and that most contemporary gene pairs in this phylogenetic system may be regarded as orthologous (split at the time of speciation) rather than paralogous (split prior to speciation). It also appears that as the statistical sample of orthologous sequence sites becomes greatly enlarged by tandem alignment of enough different types of protein chains, the parsimony reconstruction based strictly on minimal nucleotide replacement length will itself reveal the correct cladogram for the set of contemporary species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Tan, G., Muffato, M., Ledergerber, C., Herrero, J., Goldman, N., Gil, M., & Dessimoz, C. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syv033 · Cited by 261
Genome-scale coestimation of species and gene trees
Boussau, B., Szöllősi, G. J., Duret, L., Gouy, M., Tannier, E., & Daubin, V. (2013) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.141978.112 · Cited by 258
Penny, D., Foulds, L. R., & Hendy, M. D. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/297197a0 · Cited by 213
Bias in phylogenetic tree reconciliation methods: implications for vertebrate genome evolution
Hahn, M. W. (2007) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-7-r141 · Cited by 138
Widen, S. A., Bes, I. C., Koreshova, A., Pliota, P., Krogull, D., & Burga, A. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.ade0705 · Cited by 78
Wu, Y.-C., Rasmussen, M. D., Bansal, M. S., & Kellis, M. (2014) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.161968.113 · Cited by 77
GLADX: an automated approach to analyze the lineage-specific loss and pseudogenization of genes
Dainat, J., Paganini, J., Pontarotti, P., & Gouret, P. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0038792 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Goodman, M., Czelusniak, J., Moore, G. W., Romero-Herrera, A. E., & Matsuda, G.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1979-06-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 132-163
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2135281627
- Cited by
- 566
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.