The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis: A New Approach to the Quantification of Historical Biogeography
Open accessAbstract
Quantification in historical biogeography has usually been based on the search for a single branching relationship among areas of endemism. Unlike organisms, however, areas rarely have a unique hierarchical history. Dispersal barriers appear and disappear and may have different effects on different species. As a result, the biota of an area may consist of several components with separate histories, each of which may be reticulate rather than branching. In an attempt to address these problems, I present a new biogeographic method, dispersal–vicariance analysis, which reconstructs the ancestral distributions in a given phylogeny without any prior assumptions about the form of area relationships. A three-dimensional step matrix based on a simple biogeographic model is used in the reconstruction. Speciation is assumed to subdivide the ranges of widespread species into vicariant components; the optimal ancestral distributions are those that minimize the number of implied dispersal and extinction events. Exact algorithms that find the optimal reconstruction(s) are described. In addition to their use in taxon biogeography, the inferred distribution histories of individual groups serve as a basis for the study of general patterns in historical biogeography, particularly if the relative age of the nodes in the source cladograms is known.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mayr, E. (1963) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674865327 · Cited by 10,175
Cited by
A LIKELIHOOD FRAMEWORK FOR INFERRING THE EVOLUTION OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE ON PHYLOGENETIC TREES
Ree, R. H., Moore, B. R., Webb, C. O., & Donoghue, M. J. (2005) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00940.x · Cited by 893
The resurrection of oceanic dispersal in historical biogeography
QUEIROZ, A. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.11.006 · Cited by 692
Biogeography of the Indo-Australian Archipelago
Lohman, D. J., de Bruyn, M., Page, T., von Rintelen, K., Hall, R., Ng, P. K. L., Shih, H.-T., Carvalho, G. R., & von Rintelen, T. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102710-145001 · Cited by 580
A new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds
Claramunt, S., & Cracraft, J. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501005 · Cited by 383
Laurasian migration explains Gondwanan disjunctions: Evidence from Malpighiaceae
Davis, C. C., Bell, C. D., Mathews, S., & Donoghue, M. J. (2002) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.102175899 · Cited by 355
Metadata
- Authors
- Ronquist, F.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1997-03-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 195-203
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2098673312
- Cited by
- 1,801
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis: A New Approach to the Quantification of Historical Biogeography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sysbio/46.1.195
- The paper
- Ronquist, F. (1997). Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis: A New Approach to the Quantification of Historical Biogeography. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/46.1.195
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.