The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A LIKELIHOOD FRAMEWORK FOR INFERRING THE EVOLUTION OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE ON PHYLOGENETIC TREES
Abstract
At a time when historical biogeography appears to be again expanding its scope after a period of focusing primarily on discerning area relationships using cladograms, new inference methods are needed to bring more kinds of data to bear on questions about the geographic history of lineages. Here we describe a likelihood framework for inferring the evolution of geographic range on phylogenies that models lineage dispersal and local extinction in a set of discrete areas as stochastic events in continuous time. Unlike existing methods for estimating ancestral areas, such as dispersal-vicariance analysis, this approach incorporates information on the timing of both lineage divergences and the availability of connections between areas (dispersal routes). Monte Carlo methods are used to estimate branch-specific transition probabilities for geographic ranges, enabling the likelihood of the data (observed species distributions) to be evaluated for a given phylogeny and parameterized paleogeographic model. We demonstrate how the method can be used to address two biogeographic questions: What were the ancestral geographic ranges on a phylogenetic tree? How were those ancestral ranges affected by speciation and inherited by the daughter lineages at cladogenesis events? For illustration we use hypothetical examples and an analysis of a Northern Hemisphere plant clade (Cercis), comparing and contrasting inferences to those obtained from dispersal-vicariance analysis. Although the particular model we implement is somewhat simplistic, the framework itself is flexible and could readily be modified to incorporate additional sources of information and also be extended to address other aspects of historical biogeography.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
The Theory of Island Biogeography
MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (2001) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400881376 · Cited by 12,632
The Theory of Island Biogeography
Kirkby, M. J., MacArthur, R. H., & Wilson, E. O. (1968) · The Geographical Journal · doi:10.2307/1796430 · Cited by 11,581
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness
Wiens, J. J., & Donoghue, M. J. (2004) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2004.09.011 · Cited by 1,962
Self-citation(1994) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.1994.0006 · Cited by 1,859
Dispersal-Vicariance Analysis: A New Approach to the Quantification of Historical Biogeography
Ronquist, F. (1997) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/46.1.195 · Cited by 1,801
A comprehensive framework for global patterns in biodiversity
Ricklefs, R. E. (2004) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2003.00554.x · Cited by 1,360
Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance.
Brooks, D. R., Nelson, G., & Platnick, N. (1982) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2413039 · Cited by 1,338
Pagel, M. (1999) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/106351599260184 · Cited by 1,024
Cited by
Amazonian Amphibian Diversity Is Primarily Derived from Late Miocene Andean Lineages
Santos, J. C., Coloma, L. A., Summers, K., Caldwell, J. P., Ree, R., & Cannatella, D. C. (2009) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000056 · Cited by 349
Self-citationTectonic collision and uplift of Wallacea triggered the global songbird radiation
Moyle, R. G., Oliveros, C. H., Andersen, M. J., Hosner, P. A., Benz, B. W., Manthey, J. D., Travers, S. L., Brown, R. M., & Faircloth, B. C. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12709 · Cited by 240
Bonett, R. M., Steffen, M. A., Lambert, S. M., Wiens, J. J., & Chippindale, P. T. (2014) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.12274 · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Ree, R. H., Moore, B. R., Webb, C. O., & Donoghue, M. J.
- Venue
- Evolution
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-11
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2299-2311
- ISSN
- 0014-3820 (ISSN-L)
- 1558-5646
- OpenAlex
- W2174335980
- Cited by
- 893
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 15.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A LIKELIHOOD FRAMEWORK FOR INFERRING THE EVOLUTION OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE ON PHYLOGENETIC TREES. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00940.x
- The paper
- Ree, R. H., Moore, B. R., Webb, C. O., & Donoghue, M. J. (2005). A LIKELIHOOD FRAMEWORK FOR INFERRING THE EVOLUTION OF GEOGRAPHIC RANGE ON PHYLOGENETIC TREES. Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2005.tb00940.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.