Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 674

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ascomycota Tree of Life: A Phylum-wide Phylogeny Clarifies the Origin and Evolution of Fundamental Reproductive and Ecological Traits

Open access
Schoch, Conrad L., Sung, Gi-Ho, López-Giráldez, Francesc, Townsend, Jeffrey P., Miadlikowska, Jolanta, Hofstetter, Valérie, Robbertse, Barbara, Matheny, P. Brandon, Kauff, Frank, Wang, Zheng, Gueidan, Cécile, Andrie, Rachael M., Trippe, Kristin, Ciufetti, Linda M., Wynns, Anja, Fraker, Emily, Hodkinson, Brendan P., Bonito, Gregory, Groenewald, Johannes Z., Arzanlou, Mahdi, Sybren de Hoog, G., Crous, Pedro W., Hewitt, David, Pfister, Donald H., Peterson, Kristin, Gryzenhout, Marieka, Wingfield, Michael J., Aptroot, André, Suh, Sung-Oui, Blackwell, Meredith, Hillis, David M., Griffith, Gareth W., Castlebury, Lisa A., Rossman, Amy Y., Lumbsch, H. Thorsten, Lücking, Robert, Büdel, Burkhard, Rauhut, Alexandra, Diederich, Paul, Ertz, Damien, Geiser, David M., Hosaka, Kentaro, Inderbitzin, Patrik, Kohlmeyer, Jan, Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, Brigitte, Mostert, Lizel, O'Donnell, Kerry, Sipman, Harrie, Rogers, Jack D., Shoemaker, Robert A., Sugiyama, Junta, Summerbell, Richard C., Untereiner, Wendy, Johnston, Peter R., Stenroos, Soili, Zuccaro, Alga, Dyer, Paul S., Crittenden, Peter D., Cole, Mariette S., Hansen, Karen, Trappe, James M., Yahr, Rebecca, Lutzoni, François, Spatafora, Joseph W.·2009·Systematic Biology

Abstract

We present a 6-gene, 420-species maximum-likelihood phylogeny of Ascomycota, the largest phylum of Fungi. This analysis is the most taxonomically complete to date with species sampled from all 15 currently circumscribed classes. A number of superclass-level nodes that have previously evaded resolution and were unnamed in classifications of the Fungi are resolved for the first time. Based on the 6-gene phylogeny we conducted a phylogenetic informativeness analysis of all 6 genes and a series of ancestral character state reconstructions that focused on morphology of sporocarps, ascus dehiscence, and evolution of nutritional modes and ecologies. A gene-by-gene assessment of phylogenetic informativeness yielded higher levels of informativeness for protein genes (RPB1, RPB2, and TEF1) as compared with the ribosomal genes, which have been the standard bearer in fungal systematics. Our reconstruction of sporocarp characters is consistent with 2 origins for multicellular sexual reproductive structures in Ascomycota, once in the common ancestor of Pezizomycotina and once in the common ancestor of Neolectomycetes. This first report of dual origins of ascomycete sporocarps highlights the complicated nature of assessing homology of morphological traits across Fungi. Furthermore, ancestral reconstruction supports an open sporocarp with an exposed hymenium (apothecium) as the primitive morphology for Pezizomycotina with multiple derivations of the partially (perithecia) or completely enclosed (cleistothecia) sporocarps. Ascus dehiscence is most informative at the class level within Pezizomycotina with most superclass nodes reconstructed equivocally. Character-state reconstructions support a terrestrial, saprobic ecology as ancestral. In contrast to previous studies, these analyses support multiple origins of lichenization events with the loss of lichenization as less frequent and limited to terminal, closely related species.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/sysbio/syp020

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Schoch, C. L., Sung, G.-H., López-Giráldez, F., Townsend, J. P., Miadlikowska, J., Hofstetter, V., Robbertse, B., Matheny, P. B., Kauff, F., Wang, Z., Gueidan, C., Andrie, R. M., Trippe, K., Ciufetti, L. M., Wynns, A., Fraker, E., Hodkinson, B. P., Bonito, G., Groenewald, J. Z., Arzanlou, M., Sybren de Hoog, G., Crous, P. W., Hewitt, D., Pfister, D. H., Peterson, K., Gryzenhout, M., Wingfield, M. J., Aptroot, A., Suh, S.-O., Blackwell, M., Hillis, D. M., Griffith, G. W., Castlebury, L. A., Rossman, A. Y., Lumbsch, H. T., Lücking, R., Büdel, B., Rauhut, A., Diederich, P., Ertz, D., Geiser, D. M., Hosaka, K., Inderbitzin, P., Kohlmeyer, J., Volkmann-Kohlmeyer, B., Mostert, L., O'Donnell, K., Sipman, H., Rogers, J. D., Shoemaker, R. A., Sugiyama, J., Summerbell, R. C., Untereiner, W., Johnston, P. R., Stenroos, S., Zuccaro, A., Dyer, P. S., Crittenden, P. D., Cole, M. S., Hansen, K., Trappe, J. M., Yahr, R., Lutzoni, F., & Spatafora, J. W.
Venue
Systematic Biology
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
58
Issue
2
Pages
224-239
ISSN
  • 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
  • 1076-836X
OpenAlex
W2140148710
Cited by
674
References
2
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.