The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Quantitative Traits and Diversification
Abstract
Quantitative traits have long been hypothesized to affect speciation and extinction rates. For example, smaller body size or increased specialization may be associated with increased rates of diversification. Here, I present a phylogenetic likelihood-based method (quantitative state speciation and extinction [QuaSSE]) that can be used to test such hypotheses using extant character distributions. This approach assumes that diversification follows a birth-death process where speciation and extinction rates may vary with one or more traits that evolve under a diffusion model. Speciation and extinction rates may be arbitrary functions of the character state, allowing much flexibility in testing models of trait-dependent diversification. I test the approach using simulated phylogenies and show that a known relationship between speciation and a quantitative character could be recovered in up to 80% of the cases on large trees (500 species). Consistent with other approaches, detecting shifts in diversification due to differences in extinction rates was harder than when due to differences in speciation rates. Finally, I demonstrate the application of QuaSSE to investigate the correlation between body size and diversification in primates, concluding that clade-specific differences in diversification may be more important than size-dependent diversification in shaping the patterns of diversity within this group.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The Design and Implementation of FFTW3
Frigo, M., & Johnson, S. G. (2005) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2004.840301 · Cited by 5,086
Cope's Rule and the Dynamics of Body Mass Evolution in North American Fossil Mammals
Alroy, J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5364.731 · Cited by 539
Birth-Death Models in Macroevolution
Nee, S. (2006) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110035 · Cited by 342
Cited by
Phytools 2.0: an updated R ecosystem for phylogenetic comparative methods (and other things)
Revell, L. J. (2024) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.16505 · Cited by 1,244
Bayesian Evolutionary Analysis with BEAST
Drummond, A. J., & Bouckaert, R. R. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139095112 · Cited by 527
The unsolved challenge to phylogenetic correlation tests for categorical characters
Maddison, W. P., & FitzJohn, R. G. (2015) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syu070 · Cited by 468
Self-citationPhylogenetic Inference of Reciprocal Effects between Geographic Range Evolution and Diversification
Goldberg, E. E., Lancaster, L. T., & Ree, R. H. (2011) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syr046 · Cited by 425
Slater, G. J., Harmon, L. J., & Alfaro, M. E. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01723.x · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- FitzJohn, R. G.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2010-09-30
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 619-633
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2108398626
- Cited by
- 350
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 17.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Quantitative Traits and Diversification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/sysbio/syq053
- The paper
- FitzJohn, R. G. (2010). Quantitative Traits and Diversification. Systematic Biology. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syq053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.