The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Going to Extremes: Contrasting Rates of Diversification in a Recent Radiation of New World Passerine Birds
Abstract
Recent analyses suggest that a few major shifts in diversification rate may be enough to explain most of the disparity in diversity among vertebrate lineages. At least one significant increase in diversification rate appears to have occurred within the birds; however, several nested lineages within birds have been identified as hyperdiverse by different studies. A clade containing the finches and relatives (within the avian order Passeriformes), including a large radiation endemic to the New World that comprises ~8% of all bird species, may be the true driver of this rate increase. Understanding the patterns and processes of diversification of this diverse lineage may go a long way toward explaining the apparently rapid diversification rates of both passerines and of birds as a whole. We present the first multilocus phylogenetic analyses of this endemic New World radiation of finch relatives that include sampling of all recognized genera, a relaxed molecular clock analysis of its divergence history, and an analysis of its broad-scale diversification patterns. These analyses recovered 5 major lineages traditionally recognized as avian families, but identified an additional 10 relatively ancient lineages worthy of recognition at the family level. Time-calibrated diversification analyses suggested that at least 3 of the 15 family-level lineages were significantly species poor given the entire group's background diversification rate, whereas at least one-the tanagers of family Thraupidae-appeared significantly more diverse. Lack of an age-diversity relationship within this clade suggests that, due to rapid initial speciation, it may have experienced density-dependent ecological limits on its overall diversity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models
Stamatakis, A. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · Cited by 15,582
Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach.
Felsenstein, J. (1981) · Journal of Molecular Evolution · doi:10.1007/bf01734359 · Cited by 14,571
Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence
Drummond, A. J., Ho, S. Y. W., Phillips, M. J., & Rambaut, A. (2006) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0040088 · Cited by 6,463 · cited 1×
“…trees; Felsenstein 1981), so to reduce the dimensionality of our MCMC run, we enforced a molecular clock for all loci except mtDNA, for which we modeled rate change as an uncorrelated lognormal process (with an exponential prior [ = 0.1] on its standard deviation; Drummond et al. 2006).”
MethodInfluentialThe Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Bayesian inference of species trees from multilocus data
Heled, J., & Drummond, A. J. (2010) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msp274 · Cited by 2,453
A maximum pseudo-likelihood approach for estimating species trees under the coalescent model
Liu, L., Yu, L., & Edwards, S. V. (2010) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-302 · Cited by 607
Barker, F. K., Barrowclough, G. F., & Groth, J. G. (2002) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2001.1883 · Cited by 377 · cited 2×
“…recognized by current taxonomy ( As immediate outgroups, we selected members of the family Fringillidae (the sister clade to the New World group; Barker et al. 2002; Ericson and Johansson 2003; Johansson et al. 2008), including the former tanager genera In addition, we included 2 members of the…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationLikelihood Calculation in Molecular Phylogenetics
Bryant, D., Galtier, N., & Poursat, M.-A. (2005) · Mathematics of Evolution and Phylogeny · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198566106.003.0002 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds
Jarvis, E. D., Mirarab, S., Aberer, A. J., Li, B., Houde, P., Li, C., Ho, S. Y. W., Faircloth, B. C., Nabholz, B., Howard, J. T., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1253451 · Cited by 1,901
Self-citationA new time tree reveals Earth history’s imprint on the evolution of modern birds
Claramunt, S., & Cracraft, J. (2015) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501005 · Cited by 383
de Piacentini, V. Q., Aleixo, A., Agne, C. E., Maurício, G. N., Pacheco, J. F., Bravo, G. A., Brito, G. R. R., Naka, L. N., Olmos, F., Posso, S., et al. (2015) · Revista Brasileira de Ornitologia · doi:10.1007/bf03544294 · Cited by 367
No Need to Watch: How the Effects of Partisan Media Can Spread via Interpersonal Discussions
Druckman, J. N., Levendusky, M. S., & McLain, A. (2018) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12325 · Cited by 291
Why Partisans Do Not Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation
Mummolo, J., & Nall, C. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/687569 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- Barker, F. K., Burns, K. J., Klicka, J., Lanyon, S. M., & Lovette, I. J.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-12-29
- Volume
- 62
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 298-320
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2128427466
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.