Robust regression and posterior predictive simulation increase power to detect early bursts of trait evolution
Abstract
A central prediction of much theory on adaptive radiations is that traits should evolve rapidly during the early stages of a clade's history and subsequently slowdown in rate as niches become saturated--a so-called "Early Burst." Although a common pattern in the fossil record, evidence for early bursts of trait evolution in phylogenetic comparative data has been equivocal at best. We show here that this may not necessarily be due to the absence of this pattern in nature. Rather, commonly used methods to infer its presence perform poorly when when the strength of the burst--the rate at which phenotypic evolution declines--is small, and when some morphological convergence is present within the clade. We present two modifications to existing comparative methods that allow greater power to detect early bursts in simulated datasets. First, we develop posterior predictive simulation approaches and show that they outperform maximum likelihood approaches at identifying early bursts at moderate strength. Second, we use a robust regression procedure that allows for the identification and down-weighting of convergent taxa, leading to moderate increases in method performance. We demonstrate the utility and power of these approach by investigating the evolution of body size in cetaceans. Model fitting using maximum likelihood is equivocal with regards the mode of cetacean body size evolution. However, posterior predictive simulation combined with a robust node height test return low suppo…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Rigorous examination of goodness-of-fit and model adequacy following any comparative analysis is critical for finding unforeseen singular events driving signal in the data set.
“Furthermore, we also think that rigorous examination of goodness-of-fit and model adequacy following any comparative analysis is critical for finding unforeseen singular events driving signal in the data set (Garland et al. 1992;Boettiger et al. 2012;Slater and Pennell 2013;Pennell et al. 2015).”
From Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods (2018) · cites this paper as Slater and Pennell 2013
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645 · see citing works
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974 · see citing works
Robust regression using iteratively reweighted least-squares.
Holland, P. W., & Welsch, R. E. (1977) · Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods · doi:10.1080/03610927708827533 · Cited by 2,115 · see citing works
Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg extinction on mammal diversification
Meredith, R. W., Janečka, J. E., Gatesy, J., Ryder, O. A., Fisher, C. A., Teeling, E. C., Goodbla, A., Eizirik, E., Simão, T. L. L., Stadler, T., et al. (2011) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1211028 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
Slater, G. J., Harmon, L. J., & Alfaro, M. E. (2012) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01723.x · Cited by 334 · see citing works
Self-citationEastman, J. M., Alfaro, M. E., Joyce, P., Hipp, A. L., & Harmon, L. J. (2011) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01401.x · Cited by 240 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Benson, R. B. J., Campione, N. E., Carrano, M. T., Mannion, P. D., Sullivan, C., Upchurch, P., & Evans, D. C. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001853 · Cited by 457 · see citing works
Brusatte, S. L., Lloyd, G. T., Wang, S. C., & Norell, M. A. (2014) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.034 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Rethinking phylogenetic comparative methods
Uyeda, J. C., Zenil-Ferguson, R., & Pennell, M. W. (2018) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1093/sysbio/syy031 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Self-citationHopkins, M. J., & Smith, A. B. (2015) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1418153112 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
From dinosaurs to modern bird diversity: extending the time scale of adaptive radiation
Moen, D., & Morlon, H. (2014) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001854 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
- Authors
- Slater, G. J., & Pennell, M. W.
- Affiliations
- Smithsonian Institution (US)
- Corresponding author
- Slater, Graham J.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2013-10-22
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 293-308
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2143582085
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 9
- FWCI
- 7.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
- Keywords
- adaptive radiation, posterior predictive simulation, robust regression, morphological convergence, body size evolution, cetaceans, macroevolutionary models, rate shifts, Brownian motion, statistical power
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Classification, Computer Simulation, Biological Evolution, Models, Theoretical, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review