Cited by 457Evolution and Paleontology StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary BiologyPlant Diversity and Evolution

Rates of dinosaur body mass evolution indicate 170 million years of sustained ecological innovation on the avian stem lineage

Open access
Benson, Roger B. J., Campione, Nicolás E., Carrano, Matthew T., Mannion, Philip D., Sullivan, Corwin, Upchurch, Paul, Evans, David C.·2014·PLoS Biology

Abstract

Large-scale adaptive radiations might explain the runaway success of a minority of extant vertebrate clades. This hypothesis predicts, among other things, rapid rates of morphological evolution during the early history of major groups, as lineages invade disparate ecological niches. However, few studies of adaptive radiation have included deep time data, so the links between extant diversity and major extinct radiations are unclear. The intensively studied Mesozoic dinosaur record provides a model system for such investigation, representing an ecologically diverse group that dominated terrestrial ecosystems for 170 million years. Furthermore, with 10,000 species, extant dinosaurs (birds) are the most speciose living tetrapod clade. We assembled composite trees of 614-622 Mesozoic dinosaurs/birds, and a comprehensive body mass dataset using the scaling relationship of limb bone robustness. Maximum-likelihood modelling and the node height test reveal rapid evolutionary rates and a predominance of rapid shifts among size classes in early (Triassic) dinosaurs. This indicates an early burst niche-filling pattern and contrasts with previous studies that favoured gradualistic rates. Subsequently, rates declined in most lineages, which rarely exploited new ecological niches. However, feathered maniraptoran dinosaurs (including Mesozoic birds) sustained rapid evolution from at least the Middle Jurassic, suggesting that these taxa evaded the effects of niche saturation. This indicates that a long evolutionary history of continuing ecological innovation paved the way for a second great radiation of dinosaurs, in birds. We therefore demonstrate links between the predominantly extinct deep time adaptive radiation of non-avian dinosaurs and the phenomenal diversification of birds, via continuing rapid rates of evolution along the phylogenetic stem lineage. This raises the possibility that the uneven distribution of biodiversity results not just from large-scale extrapolation of the process of adaptive radiation in a few extant clades, but also from the maintenance of evolvability on vast time scales across the history of life, in key lineages.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001853

Cites

104 of 104 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At Pennaraptora and Paraves, there is a notable reduction in body size.

    “This coincides with a notable reduction in body size [3, 41, 73, 78, 79]”

    From Potential for Powered Flight Neared by Most Close Avialan Relatives, but Few Crossed Its Thresholds (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

    The Results describe notable, nested body-size reductions on the line leading to birds, including at Paraves; Table 3 (Materials and Methods) identifies the origin of small body size in Paraves. The paper identifies the other reduction at Coelurosauria, not specifically at Pennaraptora, so it supports only part of the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A survey of 1000 specimens covering dozens of species failed to recover reliable limb bone circumferences because long bones are crushed or flattened on mudrock slabs.

    “While limb bone circumference has been shown to be a more accurate proxy of theropod body size [3, 53], this measurement was not available in many important Chinese paravian taxa because their long bones are crushed or flattened on mudrock slabs (a survey of 1000 specimens covering dozens of species failed to recover reliable circumferences).”

    From Potential for Powered Flight Neared by Most Close Avialan Relatives, but Few Crossed Its Thresholds (2020) · cites this paper as [3]

    Materials and Methods describes using limb-bone circumference to estimate mass for 441 taxa, but does not report a survey of 1,000 specimens or dozens of species. Searches for crushed or flattened bones, mudrock slabs, and failed circumference measurements found no passage addressing the claimed survey. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Carrano MT, Gaudin TJ, Blob RW, Wible JR, editors. Amniote Paleobiology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. pp. 225-268
  2. Brown JH (1997) Macroecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 269 p.
  3. Slater G (in press) Erratum: phylogenetic evidence for a shift in the mode of mammalian body size evolution at the Cretaceous-Paleogene boundary. Methods Ecol Evol

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Benson, R. B. J., Campione, N. E., Carrano, M. T., Mannion, P. D., Sullivan, C., Upchurch, P., & Evans, D. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
  • Smithsonian Institution (US)
  • Imperial College London (GB)
  • Institute of Vertebrate Paleontology and Paleoanthropology (CN)
  • University College London (GB)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Benson, Roger B. J.
Venue
PLoS Biology
Published
2014-05-06
Volume
12
Issue
5
Pages
e1001853
ISSN
  • 1544-9173 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-7885
OpenAlex
W2155522161
Cited by
457
References
104
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 16
FWCI
31.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS Biology (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RUNE (Research UNE) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Smithsonian Digital Repository (Smithsonian Institution) (submittedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-129)
  • Imperial College London
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
Keywords
adaptive radiation, Mesozoic dinosaurs, green innovation, niche filling, feathered dinosaurs, body size scaling, evolutionary rates, evolvability
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Animals, Birds, Extremities, Feathers, Fossils, Phylogeny, Dinosaurs, Biodiversity, Body Size, Genetic Speciation, Extinction, Biological, Animal Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review