A Generalized K Statistic for Estimating Phylogenetic Signal from Shape and Other High-Dimensional Multivariate Data
Abstract
Phylogenetic signal is the tendency for closely related species to display similar trait values due to their common ancestry. Several methods have been developed for quantifying phylogenetic signal in univariate traits and for sets of traits treated simultaneously, and the statistical properties of these approaches have been extensively studied. However, methods for assessing phylogenetic signal in high-dimensional multivariate traits like shape are less well developed, and their statistical performance is not well characterized. In this article, I describe a generalization of the K statistic of Blomberg et al. that is useful for quantifying and evaluating phylogenetic signal in highly dimensional multivariate data. The method (K(mult)) is found from the equivalency between statistical methods based on covariance matrices and those based on distance matrices. Using computer simulations based on Brownian motion, I demonstrate that the expected value of K(mult) remains at 1.0 as trait variation among species is increased or decreased, and as the number of trait dimensions is increased. By contrast, estimates of phylogenetic signal found with a squared-change parsimony procedure for multivariate data change with increasing trait variation among species and with increasing numbers of trait dimensions, confounding biological interpretations. I also evaluate the statistical performance of hypothesis testing procedures based on K(mult) and find that the method displays appropriate Type I error and high statistical power for detecting phylogenetic signal in high-dimensional data. Statistical properties of K(mult) were consistent for simulations using bifurcating and random phylogenies, for simulations using different numbers of species, for simulations that varied the number of trait dimensions, and for different underlying models of trait covariance structure. Overall these findings demonstrate that K(mult) provides a useful means of evaluating phylogenetic signal in high-dimensional multivariate traits. Finally, I illustrate the utility of the new approach by evaluating the strength of phylogenetic signal for head shape in a lineage of Plethodon salamanders.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Multivariate phylogenetic signal is lower for each avian cranial module (Kmult = 0.48-0.66, P = 0.001) but still indicates a significant effect of phylogeny on morphology.
“Multivariate phylogenetic signal (24) is lower for each module (Kmult = 0.48–0.66, P = 0.001, SI Appendix, Table S1) but still indicates a significant effect of phylogeny on morphology.”
From Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium (2018) · cites this paper as [24]
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793 · see citing works
Extensions of the procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks
Rohlf, F. J., & Slice, D. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992207 · Cited by 4,289 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Developmental origins of mosaic evolution in the avian cranium
Felice, R. N., & Goswami, A. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1716437115 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
“Phylogenetic signal was calculated for eachmodule using the Kmult statistic, a method specifically designed for the challenges of working with high-dimensional landmark configurations (24).”
BackgroundMethodAdams, D. C. (2016) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12511 · Cited by 257 · see citing works
Self-citationComparative bioacoustics: a roadmap for quantifying and comparing animal sounds across diverse taxa
Odom, K. J., Araya‐Salas, M., Morano, J. L., Ligon, R. A., Leighton, G. M., Taff, C. C., Dalziell, A. H., Billings, A. C., Germain, R. R., Pardo, M., et al. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12695 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Pittman, M., Bell, P. R., Miller, C. V., Enriquez, N. J., Wang, X., Zheng, X., Tsang, L. R., Tse, Y. T., Landes, M., & Kaye, T. G. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-35039-1 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Juvenile ecology drives adult morphology in two insect orders
Rühr, P. T., van de Kamp, T., Faragó, T., Hammel, J. U., Wilde, F., Borisova, E., Edel, C., Frenzel, M., Baumbach, T., & Blanke, A. (2021) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2021.0616 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
- Authors
- Adams, D. C.
- Affiliations
- Iowa State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Adams, Dean C.
- ORCID
- Adams, Dean C.
- Venue
- Systematic Biology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2014-04-30
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 685-697
- ISSN
- 1063-5157 (ISSN-L)
- 1076-836X
- OpenAlex
- W2117182663
- Cited by
- 653
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 62 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 5
- FWCI
- 55.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Systematic Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- phylogenetic signal, k-statistics, covariance matrix, distance matrix, Brownian motion model, hypothesis testing, head shape
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Classification, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Head, Phylogeny, Caudata, Urodela, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review