The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Toxicogenomics-Based Discrimination of Toxic Mechanism in HepG2 Human Hepatoma Cells
Abstract
The rapid discovery of sequence information from the Human Genome Project has exponentially increased the amount of data that can be retrieved from biomedical experiments. Gene expression profiling, through the use of microarray technology, is rapidly contributing to an improved understanding of global, coordinated cellular events in a variety of paradigms. In the field of toxicology, the potential application of toxicogenomics to indicate the toxicity of unknown compounds has been suggested but remains largely unsubstantiated to date. A major supposition of toxicogenomics is that global changes in the expression of individual mRNAs (i.e., the transcriptional responses of cells to toxicants) will be sufficiently distinct, robust, and reproducible to allow discrimination of toxicants from different classes. Definitive demonstration is still lacking for such specific "genetic fingerprints," as opposed to nonspecific general stress responses that may be indistinguishable between compounds and therefore not suitable as probes of toxic mechanisms. The present studies demonstrate a general application of toxicogenomics that distinguishes two mechanistically unrelated classes of toxicants (cytotoxic anti-inflammatory drugs and DNA-damaging agents) based solely upon a cluster-type analysis of genes differentially induced or repressed in cultured cells during exposure to these compounds. Initial comparisons of the expression patterns for 100 toxic compounds, using all approximately 250 genes on a DNA microarray ( approximately 2.5 million data points), failed to discriminate between toxicant classes. A major obstacle encountered in these studies was the lack of reproducible gene responses, presumably due to biological variability and technological limitations. Thus multiple replicate observations for the prototypical DNA damaging agent, cisplatin, and the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) diflunisal and flufenamic acid were made, and a subset of genes yielding reproducible inductions/repressions was selected for comparison. Many of the "fingerprint genes" identified in these studies were consistent with previous observations reported in the literature (e. g., the well-characterized induction by cisplatin of p53-regulated transcripts such as p21(waf1/cip1) and PCNA [proliferating cell nuclear antigen]). These gene subsets not only discriminated among the three compounds in the learning set but also showed predictive value for the rest of the database ( approximately 100 compounds of various toxic mechanisms). Further refinement of the clustering strategy, using a computer-based optimization algorithm, yielded even better results and demonstrated that genes that ultimately best discriminated between DNA damage and NSAIDs were involved in such diverse processes as DNA repair, xenobiotic metabolism, transcriptional activation, structural maintenance, cell cycle control, signal transduction, and apoptosis. The determination of genes whose responses appropriately group and dissociate anti-inflammatory versus DNA-damaging agents provides an initial paradigm upon which to build for future, higher throughput-based identification of toxic compounds using gene expression patterns alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wild-Type Human p53 Transactivates the Human Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Promoter
Shivakumar, C. V., Brown, D. R., Deb, S., & Deb, S. P. (1995) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.15.12.6785 · Cited by 120
Cited by
Elucidating mechanisms of drug-induced toxicity
Liebler, D. C., & Guengerich, F. P. (2005) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1720 · Cited by 323
Boess, F. (2003) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfg064 · Cited by 306
Jennen, D. G. J., Magkoufopoulou, C., Ketelslegers, H. B., van Herwijnen, M. H. M., Kleinjans, J. C. S., & van Delft, J. H. M. (2010) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfq026 · Cited by 220
Vickers, A. E. M., Bentley, P., & Fisher, R. L. (2006) · Toxicology in Vitro · doi:10.1016/j.tiv.2006.01.021 · Cited by 48
Using Chemical-Induced Gene Expression in Cultured Human Cells to Predict Chemical Toxicity
Liu, R., Yu, X., & Wallqvist, A. (2016) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.6b00287 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Burczynski, M. E.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-12-01
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 399-415
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2141341794
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 6.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Toxicogenomics-Based Discrimination of Toxic Mechanism in HepG2 Human Hepatoma Cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/58.2.399
- The paper
- Burczynski, M. E. (2000). Toxicogenomics-Based Discrimination of Toxic Mechanism in HepG2 Human Hepatoma Cells. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/58.2.399
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.