The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Age- and Gender-Specific Pharmacokinetic Differences on Tissue Dosimetry 2Current address: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ 07936.
Open accessAbstract
The physiological and biochemical processes that determine the tissue concentration time courses (pharmacokinetics) of xenobiotics vary, in some cases significantly, with age and gender. While it is known that age- and gender-specific differences have the potential to affect tissue concentrations and, hence, individual risk, the relative importance of the contributing processes and the quantitative impact of these differences for various life stages are not well characterized. The objective of this study was to identify age- and gender-specific differences in physiological and biochemical processes that affect tissue dosimetry and integrate them into a predictive physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) life-stage model. The life-stage model was exercised for several environmental chemicals with a variety of physicochemical, biochemical, and mode-of-action properties. In general, predictions of average pharmacokinetic dose metrics for a chemical across life stages were within a factor of two, although larger transient variations were predicted, particularly during the neonatal period. The most important age-dependent pharmacokinetic factor appears to be the potential for decreased clearance of a toxic chemical in the perinatal period due to the immaturity of many metabolic enzyme systems, although this same factor may also reduce the production of a reactive metabolite. Given the potential for age-dependent pharmacodynamic factors during early life, there may be chemicals and health outcomes for which decreased clearance over a relatively brief period could have a substantial impact on risk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Milbrath, M. O., Wenger, Y., Chang, C.-W., Emond, C., Garabrant, D., Gillespie, B. W., & Jolliet, O. (2009) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.11781 · Cited by 279
PBPK modelling of inter-individual variability in the pharmacokinetics of environmental chemicals
Bois, F. Y., Jamei, M., & Clewell, H. J. (2010) · Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2010.06.007 · Cited by 194
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Clewell, H. J., Gentry, P. R., Covington, T. R., Sarangapani, R., & Teeguarden, J. G.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 79
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 381-393
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W1979141008
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Age- and Gender-Specific Pharmacokinetic Differences on Tissue Dosimetry 2Current address: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ 07936. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfh109
- The paper
- Clewell, H. J., Gentry, P. R., Covington, T. R., Sarangapani, R., & Teeguarden, J. G. (2004). Evaluation of the Potential Impact of Age- and Gender-Specific Pharmacokinetic Differences on Tissue Dosimetry 2Current address: Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ 07936. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfh109
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.