The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A 28-Day Oral Dose Toxicity Study Enhanced to Detect Endocrine Effects of Hexabromocyclododecane in Wistar Rats
Open accessAbstract
A 28-day repeated dose study in rats (OECD407) enhanced for endocrine and immune parameters was performed with hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). Rats were exposed by daily gavage to HBCD dissolved in corn oil in 8 dose groups with doses ranging between 0 and 200 mg/kg bw per day (mkd). Evaluation consisted of dose-response analysis with calculation of a benchmark dose at the lower 95% one-sided confidence bound (BMDL) at predefined critical effect sizes (CESs) of 10-20%. The most remarkable findings were dose-related effects on the thyroid hormone axis, that is, decreased total thyroxin (TT4, BMDL 55.5 mkd at CES--10%), increased pituitary weight (29 mkd at 10%) and increased immunostaining of TSH in the pituitary, increased thyroid weight (1.6 mkd at 10%), and thyroid follicle cell activation. These effects were restricted to females. Female rats also showed increased absolute liver weights (22.9 mkd at 20%) and induction of T4-glucuronyl transferase (4.1 mkd at 10%), suggesting that aberrant metabolization of T4 triggers feedback activation of the thyroid hormone system. These effects were accompanied by possibly secondary effects, including increased cholesterol (7.4 mkd at 10%), increased tibial bone mineral density (> 49 mkd at 10%), both in females, and decreased splenocyte counts (0.3-6.3 mkd at 20%; only evaluated in males). Overall, female rats appeared to be more sensitive to HBCD than male rats, and an overall BMDL is proposed at 1.6 mkd, based on a 10% increase of the thyroid weight, which was the most sensitive parameter in the sequence of events.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The molecular actions of thyroid hormone in bone
Duncan Bassett, J. H., & Williams, G. R. (2003) · Trends in Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1016/s1043-2760(03)00144-9 · Cited by 261
Cited by
Brominated flame retardants in the Arctic environment — trends and new candidates
de Wit, C. A., Herzke, D., & Vorkamp, K. (2010) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.08.037 · Cited by 746
Endocrine disruptors and obesity
Heindel, J. J., Newbold, R., & Schug, T. T. (2015) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2015.163 · Cited by 451
Marvin, C. H., Tomy, G. T., Armitage, J. M., Arnot, J. A., McCarty, L., Covaci, A., & Palace, V. (2011) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es201548c · Cited by 313
Brominated flame retardants as possible endocrine disrupters
Darnerud, P. O. (2008) · International Journal of Andrology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00869.x · Cited by 296
Metadata
- Authors
- van der Ven, L. T. M., Verhoef, A., van de Kuil, T., Slob, W., Leonards, P. E. G., Visser, T. J., Hamers, T., Herlin, M., Håkansson, H., Olausson, H., Piersma, A. H., & Vos, J. G.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-09-19
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 281-292
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2119446591
- Cited by
- 199
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 7.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 28-Day Oral Dose Toxicity Study Enhanced to Detect Endocrine Effects of Hexabromocyclododecane in Wistar Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfl113
- The paper
- van der Ven, L. T. M., Verhoef, A., van de Kuil, T., Slob, W., Leonards, P. E. G., Visser, T. J., Hamers, T., Herlin, M., Håkansson, H., Olausson, H., Piersma, A. H., & Vos, J. G. (2006). A 28-Day Oral Dose Toxicity Study Enhanced to Detect Endocrine Effects of Hexabromocyclododecane in Wistar Rats. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfl113
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.