Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A 28-Day Oral Dose Toxicity Study Enhanced to Detect Endocrine Effects of Hexabromocyclododecane in Wistar Rats

Open access
van der Ven, Leo T. M., Verhoef, Aart, van de Kuil, Ton, Slob, Wout, Leonards, Pim E. G., Visser, Theo J., Hamers, Timo, Herlin, Maria, Håkansson, Helen, Olausson, Hanna, Piersma, Aldert H., Vos, Josephus G.·2006·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

A 28-day repeated dose study in rats (OECD407) enhanced for endocrine and immune parameters was performed with hexabromocyclododecane (HBCD). Rats were exposed by daily gavage to HBCD dissolved in corn oil in 8 dose groups with doses ranging between 0 and 200 mg/kg bw per day (mkd). Evaluation consisted of dose-response analysis with calculation of a benchmark dose at the lower 95% one-sided confidence bound (BMDL) at predefined critical effect sizes (CESs) of 10-20%. The most remarkable findings were dose-related effects on the thyroid hormone axis, that is, decreased total thyroxin (TT4, BMDL 55.5 mkd at CES--10%), increased pituitary weight (29 mkd at 10%) and increased immunostaining of TSH in the pituitary, increased thyroid weight (1.6 mkd at 10%), and thyroid follicle cell activation. These effects were restricted to females. Female rats also showed increased absolute liver weights (22.9 mkd at 20%) and induction of T4-glucuronyl transferase (4.1 mkd at 10%), suggesting that aberrant metabolization of T4 triggers feedback activation of the thyroid hormone system. These effects were accompanied by possibly secondary effects, including increased cholesterol (7.4 mkd at 10%), increased tibial bone mineral density (> 49 mkd at 10%), both in females, and decreased splenocyte counts (0.3-6.3 mkd at 20%; only evaluated in males). Overall, female rats appeared to be more sensitive to HBCD than male rats, and an overall BMDL is proposed at 1.6 mkd, based on a 10% increase of the thyroid weight, which was the most sensitive parameter in the sequence of events.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/kfl113

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
van der Ven, L. T. M., Verhoef, A., van de Kuil, T., Slob, W., Leonards, P. E. G., Visser, T. J., Hamers, T., Herlin, M., Håkansson, H., Olausson, H., Piersma, A. H., & Vos, J. G.
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2006-09-19
Volume
94
Issue
2
Pages
281-292
ISSN
  • 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-6080
OpenAlex
W2119446591
Cited by
199
References
1
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A 28-Day Oral Dose Toxicity Study Enhanced to Detect Endocrine Effects of Hexabromocyclododecane in Wistar Rats. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfl113
The paper
van der Ven, L. T. M., Verhoef, A., van de Kuil, T., Slob, W., Leonards, P. E. G., Visser, T. J., Hamers, T., Herlin, M., Håkansson, H., Olausson, H., Piersma, A. H., & Vos, J. G. (2006). A 28-Day Oral Dose Toxicity Study Enhanced to Detect Endocrine Effects of Hexabromocyclododecane in Wistar Rats. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfl113

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.