The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Particokinetics In Vitro: Dosimetry Considerations for In Vitro Nanoparticle Toxicity Assessments
Open accessAbstract
The rapid growth in the use of in vitro methods for nanoparticle toxicity assessment has proceeded with limited consideration of the unique kinetics of these materials in solution. Particles in general and nanoparticles specifically, diffuse, settle, and agglomerate in cell culture media as a function of systemic and particle properties: media density and viscosity and particle size, shape, charge and density, for example. Cellular dose then is also a function of these factors as they determine the rate of transport of nanoparticles to cells in culture. Here we develop and apply the principles of dosimetry in vitro and outline an approach for simulation of nanoparticle particokinetics in cell culture systems. We illustrate that where equal mass concentrations (mug/ml) imply equal doses for dissimilar materials, the corresponding particle number or surface area concentration doses differ by orders of magnitude. More importantly, when rates of diffusional and gravitational particle delivery are accounted for, trends and magnitude of the cellular dose as a function of particle size and density differ significantly from those implied by "concentration" doses. For example, 15-nm silver nanoparticles appear approximately 4000 times more potent than micron-sized cadmium oxide particles on a cm(2)/ml media basis, but are only approximately 50 times more potent when differences in delivery to adherent cells are considered. We conclude that simple surrogates of dose can cause significant misinterpretation of response and uptake data for nanoparticles in vitro. Incorporating particokinetics and principles of dosimetry would significantly improve the basis for nanoparticle toxicity assessment, increasing the predictive power and scalability of such assays.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Limbach, L. K., Li, Y., Grass, R. N., Brunner, T. J., Hintermann, M. A., Muller, M., Gunther, D., & Stark, W. J. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es051043o · Cited by 779 · cited 4×
“Examples of this type of agglomeration can be seen in electron micrographs of a number of metal oxides (Limbach et al., 2005), C60 fullerenes (Fortner et al., 2005), and carbon nanotubes (Lisunova et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialDosimetric Comparisons of Particle Deposition and Retention in Rats and Humans
Brown, J. S., Wilson, W. E., & Grant, L. D. (2005) · Inhalation Toxicology · doi:10.1080/08958370590929475 · Cited by 131
Cited by
Nanoparticle colloidal stability in cell culture media and impact on cellular interactions
Moore, T. L., Rodriguez-Lorenzo, L., Hirsch, V., Balog, S., Urban, D., Jud, C., Rothen-Rutishauser, B., Lattuada, M., & Petri-Fink, A. (2015) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c4cs00487f · Cited by 1,082
Minimum information reporting in bio–nano experimental literature
Faria, M., Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Kent, S. J., Parton, R. G., Kavallaris, M., Johnston, A. P. R., Gooding, J. J., Corrie, S. R., Boyd, B. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Nanotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41565-018-0246-4 · Cited by 710
Soenen, S. J., Rivera-Gil, P., Montenegro, J.-M., Parak, W. J., De Smedt, S. C., & Braeckmans, K. (2011) · Nano Today · doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2011.08.001 · Cited by 699
Ocsoy, I., Paret, M. L., Ocsoy, M. A., Kunwar, S., Chen, T., You, M., & Tan, W. (2013) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/nn4034794 · Cited by 561
Toxicity assessment of nanomaterials: methods and challenges
Dhawan, A., & Sharma, V. (2010) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-010-3996-x · Cited by 466
Metadata
- Authors
- Teeguarden, J. G., Hinderliter, P. M., Orr, G., Thrall, B. D., & Pounds, J. G.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2006-11-10
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 300-312
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2139820378
- Cited by
- 765
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 15.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Particokinetics In Vitro: Dosimetry Considerations for In Vitro Nanoparticle Toxicity Assessments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfl165
- The paper
- Teeguarden, J. G., Hinderliter, P. M., Orr, G., Thrall, B. D., & Pounds, J. G. (2007). Particokinetics In Vitro: Dosimetry Considerations for In Vitro Nanoparticle Toxicity Assessments. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfl165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.