Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 710

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Minimum information reporting in bio–nano experimental literature

Open access
Faria, Matthew, Björnmalm, Mattias, Thurecht, Kristofer J., Kent, Stephen J., Parton, Robert G., Kavallaris, Maria, Johnston, Angus P. R., Gooding, J. Justin, Corrie, Simon R., Boyd, Ben J., Thordarson, Pall, Whittaker, Andrew K., Stevens, Molly M., Prestidge, Clive A., Porter, Christopher J. H., Parak, Wolfgang J., Davis, Thomas P., Crampin, Edmund J., Caruso, Frank·2018·Nature Nanotechnology

Abstract

Studying the interactions between nanoengineered materials and biological systems plays a vital role in the development of biological applications of nanotechnology and the improvement of our fundamental understanding of the bio–nano interface. A significant barrier to progress in this multidisciplinary area is the variability of published literature with regards to characterizations performed and experimental details reported. Here, we suggest a ‘minimum information standard’ for experimental literature investigating bio–nano interactions. This standard consists of specific components to be reported, divided into three categories: material characterization, biological characterization and details of experimental protocols. Our intention is for these proposed standards to improve reproducibility, increase quantitative comparisons of bio–nano materials, and facilitate meta analyses and in silico modelling.A proposed list of characterization items aims at improving reproducibility and consistency in experiments reporting the use of nanoengineered materials in biological applications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41565-018-0246-4

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Cited by

See all 710

Metadata

Authors
Faria, M., Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Kent, S. J., Parton, R. G., Kavallaris, M., Johnston, A. P. R., Gooding, J. J., Corrie, S. R., Boyd, B. J., Thordarson, P., Whittaker, A. K., Stevens, M. M., Prestidge, C. A., Porter, C. J. H., Parak, W. J., Davis, T. P., Crampin, E. J., & Caruso, F.
Venue
Nature Nanotechnology
Published
2018-09
Volume
13
Issue
9
Pages
777-785
ISSN
  • 1748-3387 (ISSN-L)
  • 1748-3395
OpenAlex
W2889274053
Cited by
710
References
71
FWCI
28.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimum information reporting in bio–nano experimental literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41565-018-0246-4
The paper
Faria, M., Björnmalm, M., Thurecht, K. J., Kent, S. J., Parton, R. G., Kavallaris, M., Johnston, A. P. R., Gooding, J. J., Corrie, S. R., Boyd, B. J., Thordarson, P., Whittaker, A. K., Stevens, M. M., Prestidge, C. A., Porter, C. J. H., Parak, W. J., Davis, T. P., Crampin, E. J., & Caruso, F. (2018). Minimum information reporting in bio–nano experimental literature. Nature Nanotechnology. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-018-0246-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.