Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 221

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Macrophage Responses to Silica Nanoparticles are Highly Conserved Across Particle Sizes

Open access
Waters, Katrina M., Masiello, Lisa M., Zangar, Richard C., Tarasevich, Barbara J., Karin, Norman J., Quesenberry, Ryan D., Bandyopadhyay, Somnath, Teeguarden, Justin G., Pounds, Joel G., Thrall, Brian D.·2009·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

Concerns about the potential adverse health effects of engineered nanoparticles stems in part from the possibility that some materials display unique chemical and physical properties at nanoscales which could exacerbate their biological activity. However, studies that have assessed the effect of particle size across a comprehensive set of biological responses have not been reported. Using a macrophage cell model, we demonstrate that the ability of unopsonized amorphous silica particles to stimulate inflammatory protein secretion and induce macrophage cytotoxicity scales closely with the total administered particle surface area across a wide range of particle diameters (7-500 nm). Whole genome microarray analysis of the early gene expression changes induced by 10- and 500-nm particles showed that the magnitude of change for the majority of genes affected correlated more tightly with particle surface area than either particle mass or number. Gene expression changes that were particle size-specific were also identified. However, the overall biological processes represented by all gene expression changes were nearly identical, irrespective of particle diameter. Direct comparison of the cell processes represented in the 10- and 500-nm particle gene sets using gene set enrichment analysis revealed that among 1009 total biological processes, none were statistically enriched in one particle size group over the other. The key mechanisms involved in silica nanoparticle-mediated gene regulation and cytotoxicity have yet to be established. However, our results suggest that on an equivalent nominal surface area basis, common biological modes of action are expected for nano- and supranano-sized silica particles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/kfn250

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 221

Metadata

Authors
Waters, K. M., Masiello, L. M., Zangar, R. C., Tarasevich, B. J., Karin, N. J., Quesenberry, R. D., Bandyopadhyay, S., Teeguarden, J. G., Pounds, J. G., & Thrall, B. D.
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2008-12-10
Volume
107
Issue
2
Pages
553-569
ISSN
  • 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-6080
OpenAlex
W2170966323
Cited by
221
References
4
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Macrophage Responses to Silica Nanoparticles are Highly Conserved Across Particle Sizes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfn250
The paper
Waters, K. M., Masiello, L. M., Zangar, R. C., Tarasevich, B. J., Karin, N. J., Quesenberry, R. D., Bandyopadhyay, S., Teeguarden, J. G., Pounds, J. G., & Thrall, B. D. (2009). Macrophage Responses to Silica Nanoparticles are Highly Conserved Across Particle Sizes. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn250

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.