The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Molecular and Histological Changes in Zebrafish Gills Exposed to Metallic Nanoparticles
Abstract
Research has demonstrated that metallic nanoparticles produce toxicity in aquatic organisms that is due largely to effects of particulates as opposed to release of dissolved ions. The present research examined the interplay of nanoparticle composition and dissolution on response of the zebrafish gill following exposure to toxic (nanocopper or nanosilver) or nontoxic (nano-TiO2) nanometals. Female zebrafish were exposed to 48-h no observable effects concentration of nanocopper and nanosilver or to soluble Cu and Ag that matched the concentration of dissolved metals released during nanoparticle exposure. Both nanocopper and nanosilver exposures increased metal content associated with gill tissue, though silver concentrations were much higher following nanosilver exposures suggesting that intact silver nanoparticles are associated with the gill. Morphological and transcriptional responses of the gills differed among various nanomaterials and between nanoparticulate and soluble species. Nanocopper increased mean gill filament width by three to fourfold between 24 and 48 h, whereas nanosilver did not alter gill filament width at either time point. Global gene expression analysis demonstrates that the exposure to each nanometal or soluble metal produces a distinct gene expression profile at both 24 and 48 h, suggesting that each exposure is producing biological response by a different mechanism. The differences in responses among the exposures indicates that each particle is having a distinct biological effect that does not appear to be driven solely by release of soluble metal ions into the water column. Based on these results, care should be taken when inferring toxicity of nanomaterials from data on a different material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Xia, T., Kovochich, M., Brant, J., Hotze, M., Sempf, J., Oberley, T., Sioutas, C., Yeh, J. I., Wiesner, M. R., & Nel, A. E. (2006) · Nano Letters · doi:10.1021/nl061025k · Cited by 1,918
Nanoparticle Silver Released into Water from Commercially Available Sock Fabrics
Benn, T. M., & Westerhoff, P. (2008) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es7032718 · Cited by 1,710
Oberdörster, E. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7021 · Cited by 1,393
Do nanoparticles present ecotoxicological risks for the health of the aquatic environment?
Moore, M. N. (2006) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.014 · Cited by 1,253
Acute toxicological effects of copper nanoparticles in vivo
Chen, Z., Meng, H., Xing, G., Chen, C., Zhao, Y., Jia, G., Wang, T., Yuan, H., Ye, C., Zhao, F., et al. (2006) · Toxicology Letters · doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.10.003 · Cited by 965
Synthesis and Antibacterial Properties of Silver Nanoparticles
Baker, C., Pradhan, A., Pakstis, L., Pochan, D., & Shah, S. I. (2005) · Journal of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1166/jnn.2005.034 · Cited by 962
Griffitt, R. J., Luo, J., Gao, J., Bonzongo, J.-C., & Barber, D. S. (2008) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1897/08-002.1 · Cited by 905
Self-citationFEDERICI, G., SHAW, B., & HANDY, R. (2007) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.07.009 · Cited by 821
Particokinetics In Vitro: Dosimetry Considerations for In Vitro Nanoparticle Toxicity Assessments
Teeguarden, J. G., Hinderliter, P. M., Orr, G., Thrall, B. D., & Pounds, J. G. (2007) · Toxicological Sciences · doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfl165 · Cited by 765
SMITH, C., SHAW, B., & HANDY, R. (2007) · Aquatic Toxicology · doi:10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.02.003 · Cited by 617
Cited by
Silver nanoparticles: Behaviour and effects in the aquatic environment
Fabrega, J., Luoma, S. N., Tyler, C. R., Galloway, T. S., & Lead, J. R. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2010.10.012 · Cited by 1,204
Effects of Engineered Nanomaterials on Plants Growth: An Overview
Aslani, F., Bagheri, S., Muhd Julkapli, N., Juraimi, A. S., Hashemi, F. S. G., & Baghdadi, A. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/641759 · Cited by 437
Nanoparticle toxicity by the gastrointestinal route: evidence and knowledge gaps
Bergin, I. L., & Witzmann, F. A. (2013) · International Journal of Biomedical Nanoscience and Nanotechnology · doi:10.1504/ijbnn.2013.054515 · Cited by 412
Physiological effects of nanoparticles on fish: A comparison of nanometals versus metal ions
Shaw, B. J., & Handy, R. D. (2011) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2011.03.009 · Cited by 408
Kim, S., & Ryu, D. (2013) · Journal of Applied Toxicology · doi:10.1002/jat.2792 · Cited by 390
Metadata
- Authors
- Griffitt, R. J., Hyndman, K., Denslow, N. D., & Barber, D. S.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2008-12-10
- Volume
- 107
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 404-415
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2121425724
- Cited by
- 444
- References
- 25
- FWCI
- 15.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Molecular and Histological Changes in Zebrafish Gills Exposed to Metallic Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfn256
- The paper
- Griffitt, R. J., Hyndman, K., Denslow, N. D., & Barber, D. S. (2009). Comparison of Molecular and Histological Changes in Zebrafish Gills Exposed to Metallic Nanoparticles. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfn256
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.