Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 309

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor

Open access
Judson, Richard S., Magpantay, Felicia Maria, Chickarmane, Vijay, Haskell, Cymra, Tania, Nessy, Taylor, Jean, Xia, Menghang, Huang, Ruili, Rotroff, Daniel M., Filer, Dayne L., Houck, Keith A., Martin, Matthew T., Sipes, Nisha, Richard, Ann M., Mansouri, Kamel, Setzer, R. Woodrow, Knudsen, Thomas B., Crofton, Kevin M., Thomas, Russell S.·2015·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

We demonstrate a computational network model that integrates 18 in vitro, high-throughput screening assays measuring estrogen receptor (ER) binding, dimerization, chromatin binding, transcriptional activation, and ER-dependent cell proliferation. The network model uses activity patterns across the in vitro assays to predict whether a chemical is an ER agonist or antagonist, or is otherwise influencing the assays through a manner dependent on the physics and chemistry of the technology platform ("assay interference"). The method is applied to a library of 1812 commercial and environmental chemicals, including 45 ER positive and negative reference chemicals. Among the reference chemicals, the network model correctly identified the agonists and antagonists with the exception of very weak compounds whose activity was outside the concentration range tested. The model agonist score also correlated with the expected potency class of the active reference chemicals. Of the 1812 chemicals evaluated, 111 (6.1%) were predicted to be strongly ER active in agonist or antagonist mode. This dataset and model were also used to begin a systematic investigation of assay interference. The most prominent cause of false-positive activity (activity in an assay that is likely not due to interaction of the chemical with ER) is cytotoxicity. The model provides the ability to prioritize a large set of important environmental chemicals with human exposure potential for additional in vivo endocrine testing. Finally, this model is generalizable to any molecular pathway for which there are multiple upstream and downstream assays available.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/kfv168

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 309

Metadata

Authors
Judson, R. S., Magpantay, F. M., Chickarmane, V., Haskell, C., Tania, N., Taylor, J., Xia, M., Huang, R., Rotroff, D. M., Filer, D. L., Houck, K. A., Martin, M. T., Sipes, N., Richard, A. M., Mansouri, K., Setzer, R. W., Knudsen, T. B., Crofton, K. M., & Thomas, R. S.
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2015-08-13
Volume
148
Issue
1
Pages
137-154
ISSN
  • 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-6080
OpenAlex
W1835137027
Cited by
309
References
3
FWCI
18.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/toxsci/kfv168
The paper
Judson, R. S., Magpantay, F. M., Chickarmane, V., Haskell, C., Tania, N., Taylor, J., Xia, M., Huang, R., Rotroff, D. M., Filer, D. L., Houck, K. A., Martin, M. T., Sipes, N., Richard, A. M., Mansouri, K., Setzer, R. W., Knudsen, T. B., Crofton, K. M., & Thomas, R. S. (2015). Integrated Model of Chemical Perturbations of a Biological Pathway Using 18 In Vitro High-Throughput Screening Assays for the Estrogen Receptor. Toxicological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfv168

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.