The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints
Open accessAbstract
The collection of chemical structure information and associated experimental data for quantitative structure–activity/property relationship (QSAR/QSPR) modeling is facilitated by an increasing number of public databases containing large amounts of useful data. However, the performance of QSAR models highly depends on the quality of the data and modeling methodology used. This study aims to develop robust QSAR/QSPR models for chemical properties of environmental interest that can be used for regulatory purposes. This study primarily uses data from the publicly available PHYSPROP database consisting of a set of 13 common physicochemical and environmental fate properties. These datasets have undergone extensive curation using an automated workflow to select only high-quality data, and the chemical structures were standardized prior to calculation of the molecular descriptors. The modeling procedure was developed based on the five Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) principles for QSAR models. A weighted k-nearest neighbor approach was adopted using a minimum number of required descriptors calculated using PaDEL, an open-source software. The genetic algorithms selected only the most pertinent and mechanistically interpretable descriptors (2–15, with an average of 11 descriptors). The sizes of the modeled datasets varied from 150 chemicals for biodegradability half-life to 14,050 chemicals for logP, with an average of 3222 chemicals across all endpoints. The optimal models were built on randomly selected training sets (75%) and validated using fivefold cross-validation (CV) and test sets (25%). The CV Q2 of the models varied from 0.72 to 0.95, with an average of 0.86 and an R2 test value from 0.71 to 0.96, with an average of 0.82. Modeling and performance details are described in QSAR model reporting format and were validated by the European Commission’s Joint Research Center to be OECD compliant. All models are freely available as an open-source, command-line application called OPEn structure–activity/property Relationship App (OPERA). OPERA models were applied to more than 750,000 chemicals to produce freely available predicted data on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s CompTox Chemistry Dashboard.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Breiman, L. (2001) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1023/a:1010933404324 · Cited by 133,538
Wu, Y. (1999) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1999.10485951 · Cited by 27,221
Empirical Model Building and Response Surfaces
Freeny, A. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488371 · Cited by 5,235
Handbook of Molecular Descriptors
Todeschini, R., & Consonni, V. (2000) · Methods and Principles in Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/9783527613106 · Cited by 4,107
Golbraikh, A., & Tropsha, A. (2002) · Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling · doi:10.1016/s1093-3263(01)00123-1 · Cited by 3,735 · cited 1×
“Different ways of calculating Q2 are available in the literature [50, 61, 62].”
BackgroundPaDEL‐descriptor: An open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints
Yap, C. W. (2011) · Journal of Computational Chemistry · doi:10.1002/jcc.21707 · Cited by 2,962
A Use's Guide to Principal Components
Jackson, J. E. (1991) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/0471725331 · Cited by 2,516
De Maesschalck, R., Jouan-Rimbaud, D., & Massart, D. L. (2000) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/s0169-7439(99)00047-7 · Cited by 2,325
p-σ-π Analysis. A Method for the Correlation of Biological Activity and Chemical Structure
Hansch, C., & Fujita, T. (1964) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja01062a035 · Cited by 2,313
Best Practices for QSAR Model Development, Validation, and Exploitation
Tropsha, A. (2010) · Molecular Informatics · doi:10.1002/minf.201000061 · Cited by 2,024
Cited by
Pyzer-Knapp, E. O., Pitera, J. W., Staar, P. W. J., Takeda, S., Laino, T., Sanders, D. P., Sexton, J., Smith, J. R., & Curioni, A. (2022) · npj Computational Materials · doi:10.1038/s41524-022-00765-z · Cited by 465
The Tox21 10K Compound Library: Collaborative Chemistry Advancing Toxicology
Richard, A. M., Huang, R., Waidyanatha, S., Shinn, P., Collins, B. J., Thillainadarajah, I., Grulke, C. M., Williams, A. J., Lougee, R. R., Judson, R. S., et al. (2021) · Chemical Research in Toxicology · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrestox.0c00264 · Cited by 323
Self-citationToxicity prediction based on artificial intelligence: A multidisciplinary overview
Pérez Santín, E., Rodríguez Solana, R., González García, M., García Suárez, M. D. M., Blanco Díaz, G. D., Cima Cabal, M. D., Moreno Rojas, J. M., & López Sánchez, J. I. (2021) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1516 · Cited by 153
D’Ambro, E. L., Pye, H. O. T., Bash, J. O., Bowyer, J., Allen, C., Efstathiou, C., Gilliam, R. C., Reynolds, L., Talgo, K., & Murphy, B. N. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.0c06580 · Cited by 145
Nyffeler, J., Willis, C., Harris, F. R., Foster, M. J., Chambers, B., Culbreth, M., Brockway, R. E., Davidson-Fritz, S., Dawson, D., Shah, I., et al. (2023) · Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.taap.2023.116513 · Cited by 67
Metadata
- Authors
- Mansouri, K., Grulke, C. M., Judson, R. S., & Williams, A. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Cheminformatics
- Published
- 2018-03-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-10
- ISSN
- 1758-2946 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793396277
- Cited by
- 624
- References
- 91
- FWCI
- 24.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/s13321-018-0263-1
- The paper
- Mansouri, K., Grulke, C. M., Judson, R. S., & Williams, A. J. (2018). OPERA models for predicting physicochemical properties and environmental fate endpoints. Journal of Cheminformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13321-018-0263-1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.