Cited by 161Animal testing and alternativesComputational Drug Discovery MethodsAgricultural safety and regulations

How Adverse Outcome Pathways Can Aid the Development and Use of Computational Prediction Models for Regulatory Toxicology

Open access
Wittwehr, Clemens, Aladjov, Hristo, Ankley, Gerald, Byrne, Hugh J., de Knecht, Joop, Heinzle, Elmar, Klambauer, Günter, Landesmann, Brigitte +10 more·2017·Toxicological Sciences

Abstract

Efforts are underway to transform regulatory toxicology and chemical safety assessment from a largely empirical science based on direct observation of apical toxicity outcomes in whole organism toxicity tests to a predictive one in which outcomes and risk are inferred from accumulated mechanistic understanding. The adverse outcome pathway (AOP) framework provides a systematic approach for organizing knowledge that may support such inference. Likewise, computational models of biological systems at various scales provide another means and platform to integrate current biological understanding to facilitate inference and extrapolation. We argue that the systematic organization of knowledge into AOP frameworks can inform and help direct the design and development of computational prediction models that can further enhance the utility of mechanistic and in silico data for chemical safety assessment. This concept was explored as part of a workshop on AOP-Informed Predictive Modeling Approaches for Regulatory Toxicology held September 24-25, 2015. Examples of AOP-informed model development and its application to the assessment of chemicals for skin sensitization and multiple modes of endocrine disruption are provided. The role of problem formulation, not only as a critical phase of risk assessment, but also as guide for both AOP and complementary model development is described. Finally, a proposal for actively engaging the modeling community in AOP-informed computational model development is made. The contents serve as a vision for how AOPs can be leveraged to facilitate development of computational prediction models needed to support the next generation of chemical safety assessment.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/toxsci/kfw207

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AOP facilitates mechanistic interpretation of models, provides a better understanding of toxicity, and allows the development of new in vitro tests.

    “AOP facilitates mechanistic interpretation of models, provides a better understanding of toxicity, and allows the development of new in vitro tests.82”

    From QSAR without borders (2020) · cites this paper as [82]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. OECD. (2010). Workshop report on OECD countries activities regarding testing, assessment and management of endocrine disrupters. Environment, Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment, No. 118, Vol. ENV/JM/MONO(2010)2. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, France.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wittwehr, C., Aladjov, H., Ankley, G., Byrne, H. J., de Knecht, J., Heinzle, E., Klambauer, G., Landesmann, B., Luijten, M., MacKay, C., Maxwell, G., Meek, M. E. (., Paini, A., Perkins, E., Sobanski, T., Villeneuve, D., Waters, K. M., & Whelan, M.
Affiliations
  • European Commission (BE)
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
  • Environmental Protection Agency (US)
  • Saarland University (DE)
  • Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT)
  • National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (NL)
  • Unilever (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
  • U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center (US)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Wittwehr, Clemens
Venue
Toxicological Sciences
Published
2016-12-19
Volume
155
Issue
2
Pages
326-336
ISSN
  • 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-6080
OpenAlex
W2563115000
Cited by
161
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 1
FWCI
35.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Toxicological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow - TU Dublin (Technological University Dublin) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Joint Research Centre (European Commission) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm Repository (Netherlands National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
  • Rivm (National Institute for Public Health and the Environment) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Energy (DE-AC05–76RL01830, 76RL01830, AC05-76RL01830, DE-AC05?, Contract DE-AC05-76RL01830)
  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
  • Battelle (AC05-76RL01830, DE- AC05-76RL01830, DE-AC05)
  • University of Ottawa
  • University of Leeds
  • European Commission
  • Liverpool John Moores University
  • Universität des Saarlandes
  • Technological University Dublin
  • Rijksinstituut voor Volksgezondheid en Milieu
  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (P42ES016465)
  • U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (DEAC0576RL01830, 76RL01830)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal testing and alternatives
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
adverse outcome pathways, computational prediction model, regulatory toxicology, chemical safety assessment, in silico modeling, mechanistic risk assessment, skin sensitization, endocrine disruption, problem formulation, extrapolation, knowledge organization
MeSH terms
Adverse Outcome Pathways, Animals, Computer Simulation, Humans, Toxicology, Toxicity Tests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review