The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Making Waves: New Developments in Toxicology With the Zebrafish
Open accessAbstract
The laboratory zebrafish (Danio rerio) is now an accepted model in toxicologic research. The zebrafish model fills a niche between in vitro models and mammalian biomedical models. The developmental characteristics of the small fish are strategically being used by scientists to study topics ranging from high-throughput toxicity screens to toxicity in multi- and transgenerational studies. High-throughput technology has increased the utility of zebrafish embryonic toxicity assays in screening of chemicals and drugs for toxicity or effect. Additionally, advances in behavioral characterization and experimental methodology allow for observation of recognizable phenotypic changes after xenobiotic exposure. Future directions in zebrafish research are predicted to take advantage of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing methods in creating models of disease and interrogating mechanisms of action with fluorescent reporters or tagged proteins. Zebrafish can also model developmental origins of health and disease and multi- and transgenerational toxicity. The zebrafish has many advantages as a toxicologic model and new methodologies and areas of study continue to expand the usefulness and application of the zebrafish.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The zebrafish reference genome sequence and its relationship to the human genome.
Howe, K., Clark, M. D., Torroja, C. F., Torrance, J., Berthelot, C., Muffato, M., Collins, J. E., Humphray, S., McLaren, K., Matthews, L., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12111 · Cited by 5,100
Multi-omics approaches to disease
Hasin, Y., Seldin, M., & Lusis, A. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-017-1215-1 · Cited by 2,953
Efficient genome editing in zebrafish using a CRISPR-Cas system
Hwang, W. Y., Fu, Y., Reyon, D., Maeder, M. L., Tsai, S. Q., Sander, J. D., Peterson, R. T., Yeh, J.-R. J., & Joung, J. K. (2013) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.2501 · Cited by 2,937
Single-cell epigenomic variability reveals functional cancer heterogeneity
Litzenburger, U. M., Buenrostro, J. D., Wu, B., Shen, Y., Sheffield, N. C., Kathiria, A., Greenleaf, W. J., & Chang, H. Y. (2017) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-1133-7 · Cited by 115
Cited by
Sulfonamide functional head on short-chain perfluorinated substance drives developmental toxicity
Rericha, Y., Cao, D., Truong, L., Simonich, M. T., Field, J. A., & Tanguay, R. L. (2022) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2022.103789 · Cited by 64
Chen, M., Li, J., Liang, J., Thompson, Z. S., Kathrein, K., Broude, E. V., & Roninson, I. B. (2019) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells8111413 · Cited by 57
Madgaonkar, S. R., Chivukula, N., Garisetti, V., Marigoudar, S. R., Sharma, K. V., & Samal, A. (2026) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1093/etojnl/vgag026
Metadata
- Authors
- Horzmann, K. A., & Freeman, J. L.
- Venue
- Toxicological Sciences
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2018-02-19
- Volume
- 163
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-12
- ISSN
- 1096-0929 (ISSN-L)
- 1096-6080
- OpenAlex
- W2789319500
- Cited by
- 332
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.