The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples
Abstract
A carbon-flow model for managed forest plantations was used to estimate carbon storage in UK plantations differing in Yield Class (growth rate), thinning regime and species characteristics. Time-averaged, total carbon storage (at equilibrium) was generally in the range 40-80 Mg C ha(-1) in trees, 15-25 Mg C ha(-1) in above- and belowground litter, 70-90 Mg C ha(-1) in soil organic matter and 20-40 Mg C ha(-1) in wood products (assuming product lifetime equalled rotation length). The rate of carbon storage during the first rotation in most plantations was in the range 2-5 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1).A sensitivity analysis revealed the following processes to be both uncertain and critical: the fraction of total woody biomass in branches and roots; litter and soil organic matter decomposition rates; and rates of fine root turnover. Other variables, including the time to canopy closure and the possibility of accelerated decomposition after harvest, were less critical. The lifetime of wood products was not critical to total carbon storage because wood products formed only a modest fraction of the total.The average increase in total carbon storage in the tree-soil-product system per unit increase in Yield Class (m(3) ha(-1) year(-1)) for unthinned Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr. plantations was 5.6 Mg C ha(-1). Increasing the Yield Class from 6 to 24 m(3) ha(-1) year(-1) increased the rate of carbon storage in the first rotation from 2.5 to 5.6 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1) in unthinned plantations. Thinning reduced total carbon storage in P. sitchensis plantations by about 15%, and is likely to reduce carbon storage in all plantation types.If the objective is to store carbon rapidly in the short term and achieve high carbon storage in the long term, Populus plantations growing on fertile land (2.7 m spacing, 26-year rotations, Yield Class 12) were the best option examined. If the objective is to achieve high carbon storage in the medium term (50 years) without regard to the initial rate of storage, then plantations of conifers of any species with above-average Yield Classes would suffice. In the long term (100 years), broadleaved plantations of oak and beech store as much carbon as conifer plantations. Mini-rotations (10 years) do not achieve a high carbon storage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Swift, M. J., Heal, O. W., & Anderson, J. M. (1979) · University of California Press eBooks · doi:10.1525/9780520407114 · Cited by 4,582
Analysis of Factors Controlling Soil Organic Matter Levels in Great Plains Grasslands
Parton, W. J., Schimel, D. S., Cole, C. V., & Ojima, D. S. (1987) · Soil Science Society of America Journal · doi:10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100050015x · Cited by 3,759
Soil carbon pools and world life zones
Post, W. M., Emanuel, W. R., Zinke, P. J., & Stangenberger, A. G. (1982) · Nature · doi:10.1038/298156a0 · Cited by 2,255
Production, Turnover, and Nutrient Dynamics of Above- and Belowground Detritus of World Forests
Vogt, K. A., Grier, C. C., & Vogt, D. J. (1986) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(08)60122-1 · Cited by 962
Houghton, R. A., Hobbie, J. E., Melillo, J. M., Moore, B., Peterson, B. J., Shaver, G. R., & Woodwell, G. M. (1983) · Ecological Monographs · doi:10.2307/1942531 · Cited by 928
Effects on Carbon Storage of Conversion of Old-Growth Forests to Young Forests
Harmon, M. E., Ferrell, W. K., & Franklin, J. F. (1990) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.247.4943.699 · Cited by 819
Covington, W. W. (1981) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1936666 · Cited by 500
World Forest Biomass and Primary Production Data.
Edwards, P. J., & Cannell, M. G. R. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259741 · Cited by 439
Self-citationGrier, C. C., Vogt, K. A., Keyes, M. R., & Edmonds, R. L. (1981) · Canadian Journal of Forest Research · doi:10.1139/x81-021 · Cited by 392
HOUGHTON, R. A., BOONE, R. D., FRUCI, J. R., HOBBIE, J. E., MELILLO, J. M., PALM, C. A., PETERSON, B. J., SHAVER, G. R., WOODWELL, G. M., MOORE, B., et al. (1987) · Tellus B · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0889.1987.tb00277.x · Cited by 349
Cited by
Bringing Ecosystem Services into Economic Decision-Making: Land Use in the United Kingdom
Bateman, I. J., Harwood, A. R., Mace, G. M., Watson, R. T., Abson, D. J., Andrews, B., Binner, A., Crowe, A., Day, B. H., Dugdale, S., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234379 · Cited by 1,031
A reassessment of carbon content in wood: variation within and between 41 North American species
Lamlom, S. H., & Savidge, R. A. (2003) · Biomass and Bioenergy · doi:10.1016/s0961-9534(03)00033-3 · Cited by 640
Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests
(2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781849776417 · Cited by 279
Carbon sequestration in perennial bioenergy, annual corn and uncultivated systems in southern Quebec
Zan, C. S., Fyles, J. W., Girouard, P., & Samson, R. A. (2001) · Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment · doi:10.1016/s0167-8809(00)00273-5 · Cited by 218
A Review of Fine Root Dynamics in Populus Plantations
Block, R. M. A., Van Rees, K. C. J., & Knight, J. D. (2006) · Agroforestry Systems · doi:10.1007/s10457-005-2002-7 · Cited by 129
Metadata
- Authors
- Dewar, R. C., & Cannell, M. G. R.
- Venue
- Tree Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1992-07-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 49-71
- ISSN
- 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-4469
- OpenAlex
- W1976357990
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 13.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/11.1.49
- The paper
- Dewar, R. C., & Cannell, M. G. R. (1992). Carbon sequestration in the trees, products and soils of forest plantations: an analysis using UK examples. Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/11.1.49
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.