The DOI matches its Crossref record; 234 of the 234 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests
Open accessAbstract
Plantation forests often have a negative image. They are typically assumed to be poor substitutes for natural forests, particularly in terms of biodiversity conservation, carbon storage, provision of clean drinking water and other non-timber goods and services. Often they are monocultures that do not appear to invite people for recreation and other direct uses. Yet as this book clearly shows, they can play a vital role in the provision of ecosystem services, when compared to agriculture and other forms of land use or when natural forests have been degraded. This is the first book to examine explicitly the non-timber goods and services provided by plantation forests, including soil, water and biodiversity conservation, as well as carbon sequestration and the provision of local livelihoods. The authors show that, if we require a higher provision of ecosystem goods and services from both temperate and tropical plantations, new approaches to their management are required. These include policies, methods for valuing the services, the practices of small landholders, landscape approaches to optimise delivery of goods and services, and technical issues about how to achieve suitable solutions at the scale of forest stands. While providing original theoretical insights, the book also gives guidance for plantation managers, policy-makers, conservation practitioners and community advocates, who seek to promote or strengthen the multiple-use of forest plantations for improved benefits for society.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Valente, T. W. (2003) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000061743.67794.c4 · Cited by 13,723
Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis
Assessment, M. E. (2005) · Island Press · doi:10.5281/zenodo.18167309 · Cited by 10,665
Temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition and feedbacks to climate change
Davidson, E. A., & Janssens, I. A. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04514 · Cited by 6,919
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Pharo, E., & Daily, G. C. (1998) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3244191 · Cited by 5,261
Consequences of changing biodiversity
Chapin III, F. S., Zavaleta, E. S., Eviner, V. T., Naylor, R. L., Vitousek, P. M., Reynolds, H. L., Hooper, D. U., Lavorel, S., Sala, O. E., Hobbie, S. E., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35012241 · Cited by 4,282
Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003
Ciais, P., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Ogée, J., Allard, V., Aubinet, M., Buchmann, N., Bernhofer, C., Carrara, A., et al. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03972 · Cited by 4,146
Rural Livelihoods and Diversity in Developing Countries
Ellis, F. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198296959.001.0001 · Cited by 3,999
The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths
Lambin, E. F., Turner, B. L., Geist, H. J., Agbola, S. B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J. W., Coomes, O. T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., et al. (2001) · Global Environmental Change · doi:10.1016/s0959-3780(01)00007-3 · Cited by 3,788
de Groot, R. S., Alkemade, R., Braat, L., Hein, L., & Willemen, L. (2010) · Ecological Complexity · doi:10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.10.006 · Cited by 3,464
Biodiversity and ecosystem productivity in a fluctuating environment: The insurance hypothesis
Yachi, S., & Loreau, M. (1999) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1463 · Cited by 3,211
Cited by
For the sake of resilience and multifunctionality, let's diversify planted forests!
Messier, C., Bauhus, J., Sousa‐Silva, R., Auge, H., Baeten, L., Barsoum, N., Bruelheide, H., Caldwell, B., Cavender‐Bares, J., Dhiedt, E., et al. (2022) · Conservation Letters · doi:10.1111/conl.12829 · Cited by 416
Self-citationBiodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context
Ratcliffe, S., Wirth, C., Jucker, T., van der Plas, F., Scherer‐Lorenzen, M., Verheyen, K., Allan, E., Benavides, R., Bruelheide, H., Ohse, B., et al. (2017) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12849 · Cited by 389
Multiple forest attributes underpin the supply of multiple ecosystem services
Felipe-Lucia, M. R., Soliveres, S., Penone, C., Manning, P., van der Plas, F., Boch, S., Prati, D., Ammer, C., Schall, P., Gossner, M. M., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07082-4 · Cited by 334
Contributions of a global network of tree diversity experiments to sustainable forest plantations
Verheyen, K., Vanhellemont, M., Auge, H., Baeten, L., Baraloto, C., Barsoum, N., Bilodeau-Gauthier, S., Bruelheide, H., Castagneyrol, B., Godbold, D., et al. (2016) · Ambio · doi:10.1007/s13280-015-0685-1 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Venue
- Routledge eBooks
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Published
- 2010-09-23
- OpenAlex
- W1549573801
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 234
- FWCI
- 10.37
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.4324/9781849776417
- The paper
- Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests. (2010). Routledge eBooks. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781849776417
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
