Cited by 105Plant responses to elevated CO2Bioenergy crop production and managementPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation

Open access
Calfapietra, C., Gielen, B., Galema, A. N. J., Lukac, M., De Angelis, P., Moscatelli, M. C., Ceulemans, R., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.·2003·Tree Physiology

Abstract

This paper investigates the possible contribution of Short Rotation Cultures (SRC) to carbon sequestration in both current and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentrations ([CO2]). A dense poplar plantation (1 x 1 m) was exposed to a [CO2] of 550 ppm in Central Italy using the free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) technique. Three species of Populus were examined, namely P. alba L., P. nigra L. and P. x euramericana Dode (Guinier). Aboveground woody biomass of trees exposed to elevated [CO2] for three growing seasons increased by 15 to 27%, depending on species. As a result, light-use efficiency increased. Aboveground biomass allocation was unaffected, and belowground biomass also increased under elevated [CO2] conditions, by 22 to 38%. Populus nigra, with total biomass equal to 62.02 and 72.03 Mg ha-1 in ambient and elevated [CO2], respectively, was the most productive species, although its productivity was stimulated least by atmospheric CO2 enrichment. There was greater depletion of inorganic nitrogen from the soil after three growing seasons in elevated [CO2], but no effect of [CO2] on stem wood density, which differed significantly only among species.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/treephys/23.12.805

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Values for fine roots from willow and poplar grown as short-rotation forestry are lower than for short-rotation coppice.

    “Several authors investigated fine roots from willow and poplar grown as SRC [5, 30, 81, 82, 88, 89] and SRF [72, 90–93], values for the latter being lower (Table 1).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Saxe, H., D.S. Ellsworth and J. Heath. 1998. Tree and forest function- ing in an enriched CO 2 atmosphere. Tansley Review No. 98. New Phytol. 139:395-436.
  2. Schlesinger, W.H. 1997. Biogeochemistry and analysis of global change. 2nd Edn. Academic Press, New York, 592 p.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calfapietra, C., Gielen, B., Galema, A. N. J., Lukac, M., De Angelis, P., Moscatelli, M. C., Ceulemans, R., & Scarascia-Mugnozza, G.
Affiliations
  • Università degli Studi della Tuscia (IT)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
  • Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Venue
Tree Physiology
Published
2003-08-01
Volume
23
Issue
12
Pages
805-814
ISSN
  • 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-4469
OpenAlex
W2129758456
Cited by
105
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
14.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tree Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (other-oa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant responses to elevated CO2
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
free-air CO2 enrichment, elevated CO2, short-rotation poplar, Populus alba, Populus nigra, Populus euramericana, aboveground biomass, carbon sequestration, light use efficiency, biomass allocation, belowground biomass, soil nitrogen depletion, wood density, short rotation forestry
MeSH terms
Carbon Dioxide, Photosynthesis, Trees, Plant Roots, Plant Shoots, Biomass, Populus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review