Cited by 66Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant InteractionsSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsPlant nutrient uptake and metabolism

Soil DIC uptake and fixation in Pinus taeda seedlings and its C contribution to plant tissues and ectomycorrhizal fungi

Ford, C. R., Wurzburger, N., Hendrick, R. L., Teskey, R. O.·2007·Tree Physiology

Abstract

Plants can acquire carbon from sources other than atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO(2)), including soil-dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). Although the net flux of CO(2) is out of the root, soil DIC can be taken up by the root, transported within the plant, and fixed either photosynthetically or anaplerotically by plant tissues. We tested the ability of Pinus taeda L. seedlings exposed to (13)C-labeled soil DIC and two NH(4)(+) availability regimes to take up and fix soil DIC. We also measured the concentration and distribution of the fixed soil DIC within the plant and mycorrhizal tissues, and quantified the contribution of soil DIC to whole-plant carbon (C) gain. Seedlings exposed to labeled DIC were significantly enriched in (13)C compared with seedlings exposed to unlabeled DIC (6.7 versus -31.7 per thousand). Fixed soil DIC was almost evenly distributed between above- and belowground biomass (55 and 45%, respectively), but was unevenly distributed among tissues. Aboveground, stem tissue contained 65% of the fixed soil DIC but represented only 27% of the aboveground biomass, suggesting either corticular photosynthesis or preferential stem allocation. Belowground, soil DIC had the greatest effect (measured as (13)C enrichment) on the C pool of rapidly growing nonmycorrhizal roots. Soil DIC contributed approximately 0.8% to whole-plant C gain, and approximately 1.6% to belowground C gain. We observed a slight but nonsignificant increase in both relative C gain and the contribut…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/treephys/27.3.375

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ford, C. R., Wurzburger, N., Hendrick, R. L., & Teskey, R. O.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Tree Physiology
Published
2007-03-01
Volume
27
Issue
3
Pages
375-383
ISSN
  • 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-4469
OpenAlex
W2331283704
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Tree Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
Keywords
ectomycorrhizal fungi, carbon allocation, 13C labeling, ammonium availability, fine roots
MeSH terms
Carbon, Carbon Dioxide, Carbon Isotopes, Fungi, Nitrogen, Soil, Ecosystem, Biomass, Seedlings, Mycorrhizae, Pinus taeda

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review