Cited by 15Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesSoil Carbon and Nitrogen DynamicsIsotope Analysis in Ecology

Radiocarbon Anomalies from Old CO2 in the Soil and Canopy Air

Open access
Soter, Steven·2011·Radiocarbon

Abstract

The canopies of forests and cultivated fields can retard the ventilation of CO 2 respired from the soil. The plants in dense canopies can then acquire a small fraction of their carbon by recycling some of the respired CO 2. Furthermore, some plants can assimilate a small fraction of their carbon by uptake of CO 2 in the soil via their roots. In tectonically active areas, the diffuse flux of CO 2 from geological sources may be comparable to that from normal soil respiration. In such areas, both the canopy and root uptake effects may allow plants to acquire a measurable fraction of their carbon from geological sources. Because this “old” carbon lacks radiocarbon, its assimilation would increase the apparent 14 C ages of the plants. These effects may account for some of the discrepancies between archaeological and 14 C dates.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s0033822200034354

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

5 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Atkin OK, Westbeek MHM, Cambridge ML, Lambers H, Pons TL. 1997. Leaf respiration in light and darkness. Plant Physiology 113(3):961-5.
  2. Buchmann N, Ehleringer JR. 1998. CO 2 concentration profiles, and carbon and oxygen isotopes in C 3 and C 4 crop canopies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 89(1):45-58.
  3. Jassal R, Black A, Novak M, Morgenstern K, Nesic Z, Gaumont-Guay D. 2005. Relationship between soil CO 2 and forest-floor CO 2 effluxes. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 130(3-4):176-92.
  4. Raich JW, Schlesinger WH. 1992. The global carbon di- oxide flux in soil respiration and its relation to vege- tation and climate. Tellus B 44(2):81-99.
  5. Sulerzhitsky CD. 1971. Radiocarbon dating of volca- noes. Bulletin of Volcanology 35(1):85-94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soter, S.
Affiliations
American Museum of Natural History (US)
Corresponding author
Soter, Steven
Venue
Radiocarbon
Published
2011
Volume
53
Issue
1
Pages
55-69
ISSN
  • 0033-8222 (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-5755
OpenAlex
W2231106787
Cited by
15
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Radiocarbon (publishedVersion)
  • UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Institute for Aegean Prehistory
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Isotope Analysis in Ecology
Keywords
old carbon, soil respiration, tectonic activity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review