Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Carbon budgets of temperate forest ecosystems

Vogt, K.·1991·Tree Physiology

Abstract

A summary of carbon-budget data from 30 forest stands is presented together with information on both above- and belowground ecosystem components. Only 10 of the stands had complete biomass data, 21 had complete productivity data and six had heterotrophic, or autotrophic respiration data, or both. The most comprehensive stand-level data have been collected for Pinus spp., Pseudotsuga menziesii, Abies amabilis and Liriodendron tulipifera. Only incomplete carbon budgets are available for most ecosystems studied, because measurements have been limited to one or several ecosystem processes (e.g., decay, productivity, storage). Based on the few complete C-budget studies that have been published, it is concluded that tree species differ in annual turnover of tissues.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/treephys/9.1-2.69

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 189

Metadata

Authors
Vogt, K.
Venue
Tree Physiology
Published
1991-07-01
Volume
9
Issue
1-2
Pages
69-86
ISSN
  • 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-4469
OpenAlex
W2330946153
Cited by
189
References
0
FWCI
3.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carbon budgets of temperate forest ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/9.1-2.69
The paper
Vogt, K. (1991). Carbon budgets of temperate forest ecosystems. Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/9.1-2.69

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.