The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation?
Abstract
In a greenhouse study we quantified the gradual change of gas exchange, water relations and root reserves of aspen (Populus tremuloides Michx.) seedlings growing over a 3-month period of severe water stress. The aim of the study was to quantify the complex interrelationship between growth, water and gas exchange, and root carbon (C) dynamics. Various growth, gas exchange and water relations variables in combination with root reserves were measured periodically on seedlings that had been exposed to a continuous drought treatment over a 12-week period and compared with well-watered seedlings. Although gas exchange and water relations parameters significantly decreased over the drought period in aspen seedlings, root reserves did not mirror this trend. During the course of the experiment roots of aspen seedlings growing under severe water stress showed a two orders of magnitude increase in sugar and starch content, and roots of these seedlings contained more starch relative to sugar than those in non-droughted seedlings. Drought resulted in a switch from growth to root reserves storage which indicates a close interrelationship between growth and physiological variables and the accumulation of root carbohydrate reserves. Although a severe 3-month drought period created physiological symptoms of C limitation, there was no indication of a depletion of root C reserve in aspen seedlings.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Allen, C. D., Macalady, A. K., Chenchouni, H., Bachelet, D., McDowell, N., Vennetier, M., Kitzberger, T., Rigling, A., Breshears, D. D., Hogg, E. H. (., et al. (2010) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.001 · Cited by 7,763
Understanding plant responses to drought—from genes to the whole plant.
Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003) · Functional Plant Biology · doi:10.1071/fp02076 · Cited by 3,845
Cited by
Hartmann, H., & Trumbore, S. (2016) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13955 · Cited by 886
Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine?
Sala, A., Woodruff, D. R., & Meinzer, F. C. (2012) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpr143 · Cited by 847
The roles of hydraulic and carbon stress in a widespread climate-induced forest die-off
Anderegg, W. R. L., Berry, J. A., Smith, D. D., Sperry, J. S., Anderegg, L. D. L., & Field, C. B. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1107891109 · Cited by 698
Identifying environmental controls on vegetation greenness phenology through model–data integration
(2014) · doi:10.5194/bg-11-7025-2014 · Cited by 109
Metadata
- Authors
- Galvez, D. A., Landhausser, S. M., & Tyree, M. T.
- Venue
- Tree Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-03-01
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 250-257
- ISSN
- 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-4469
- OpenAlex
- W2162339500
- Cited by
- 184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 11.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/tpr012
- The paper
- Galvez, D. A., Landhausser, S. M., & Tyree, M. T. (2011). Root carbon reserve dynamics in aspen seedlings: does simulated drought induce reserve limitation? Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tpr012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.