The DOI matches its Crossref record; 96 of the 96 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pulse-labelling trees to study carbon allocation dynamics: a review of methods, current knowledge and future prospects
Open accessAbstract
Pulse-labelling of trees with stable or radioactive carbon (C) isotopes offers the unique opportunity to trace the fate of labelled CO(2) into the tree and its release to the soil and the atmosphere. Thus, pulse-labelling enables the quantification of C partitioning in forests and the assessment of the role of partitioning in tree growth, resource acquisition and C sequestration. However, this is associated with challenges as regards the choice of a tracer, the methods of tracing labelled C in tree and soil compartments and the quantitative analysis of C dynamics. Based on data from 47 studies, the rate of transfer differs between broadleaved and coniferous species and decreases as temperature and soil water content decrease. Labelled C is rapidly transferred belowground-within a few days or less-and this transfer is slowed down by drought. Half-lives of labelled C in phloem sap (transfer pool) and in mature leaves (source organs) are short, while those of sink organs (growing tissues, seasonal storage) are longer. (13)C measurements in respiratory efflux at high temporal resolution provide the best estimate of the mean residence times of C in respiratory substrate pools, and the best basis for compartmental modelling. Seasonal C dynamics and allocation patterns indicate that sink strength variations are important drivers for C fluxes. We propose a conceptual model for temperate and boreal trees, which considers the use of recently assimilated C versus stored C. We recommend best practices for designing and analysing pulse-labelling experiments, and identify several topics which we consider of prime importance for future research on C allocation in trees: (i) whole-tree C source-sink relations, (ii) C allocation to secondary metabolism, (iii) responses to environmental change, (iv) effects of seasonality versus phenology in and across biomes, and (v) carbon-nitrogen interactions. Substantial progress is expected from emerging technologies, but the largest challenge remains to carry out in situ whole-tree labelling experiments on mature trees to improve our understanding of the environmental and physiological controls on C allocation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C
Vance, E. D., Brookes, P. C., & Jenkinson, D. S. (1987) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6 · Cited by 12,887
Poorter, H., Niklas, K. J., Reich, P. B., Oleksyn, J., Poot, P., & Mommer, L. (2012) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03952.x · Cited by 3,163
Stable Isotopes in Plant Ecology
Dawson, T. E., Mambelli, S., Plamboeck, A. H., Templer, P. H., & Tu, K. P. (2002) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.33.020602.095451 · Cited by 1,947
Carbon allocation in forest ecosystems
LITTON, C. M., RAICH, J. W., & RYAN, M. G. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01420.x · Cited by 1,063
The interdependence of mechanisms underlying climate-driven vegetation mortality
McDowell, N. G., Beerling, D. J., Breshears, D. D., Fisher, R. A., Raffa, K. F., & Stitt, M. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.003 · Cited by 1,020
Carbon dynamics in trees: feast or famine?
Sala, A., Woodruff, D. R., & Meinzer, F. C. (2012) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/tpr143 · Cited by 847
Towards a more plant physiological perspective on soil ecology
HOGBERG, P., & READ, D. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.004 · Cited by 839
Self-citationKUZYAKOV, Y., & GAVRICHKOVA, O. (2010) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02179.x · Cited by 687
Plant CO2 responses: an issue of definition, time and resource supply
Körner, C. (2006) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01886.x · Cited by 608
Ryan, M. G., Hubbard, R. M., Pongracic, S., Raison, R. J., & McMurtrie, R. E. (1996) · Tree Physiology · doi:10.1093/treephys/16.3.333 · Cited by 544
Cited by
Carbon input by roots into the soil: Quantification of rhizodeposition from root to ecosystem scale
Pausch, J., & Kuzyakov, Y. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13850 · Cited by 1,010
Tree rings reveal globally coherent signature of cosmogenic radiocarbon events in 774 and 993 CE
Büntgen, U., Wacker, L., Galván, J. D., Arnold, S., Arseneault, D., Baillie, M., Beer, J., Bernabei, M., Bleicher, N., Boswijk, G., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06036-0 · Cited by 183
Metadata
- Authors
- Epron, D., Bahn, M., Derrien, D., Lattanzi, F. A., Pumpanen, J., Gessler, A., Hogberg, P., Maillard, P., Dannoura, M., Gerant, D., & Buchmann, N.
- Venue
- Tree Physiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2012-06-01
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 776-798
- ISSN
- 0829-318X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-4469
- OpenAlex
- W2140115134
- Cited by
- 264
- References
- 96
- FWCI
- 16.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pulse-labelling trees to study carbon allocation dynamics: a review of methods, current knowledge and future prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/treephys/tps057
- The paper
- Epron, D., Bahn, M., Derrien, D., Lattanzi, F. A., Pumpanen, J., Gessler, A., Hogberg, P., Maillard, P., Dannoura, M., Gerant, D., & Buchmann, N. (2012). Pulse-labelling trees to study carbon allocation dynamics: a review of methods, current knowledge and future prospects. Tree Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1093/treephys/tps057
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.