Is land titling in Sub-Saharan Africa cost effective? Evidence from Madagascar
Open accessAbstract
Formalizing land rights has been promoted as a way to encourage agricultural investment and stimulate land markets, yet little is known about the benefits of such policies in Sub-Saharan Africa, where the preconditions for success are less favorable. The analysis uses a large sample of plots from an intensively titled rice-growing area of Madagascar and compares land-specific investments, land productivity, and land values for titled and untitled plots cultivated by the same household. Having a title has no significant effect on plot-specific investment and correspondingly little effect on land productivity and land values. These results are broadly consistent with a simulation of a theoretical model of investment under expropriation risk calibrated to the same data. A cost–benefit analysis suggests that the current system of formal titling should not be extended in rural Madagascar and that any new system of land registration would have to be quite inexpensive to be worthwhile.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cost of conventional land titling approaches (US$20 to US$60 per parcel for first-time adjudication in successful projects, and much larger in Africa) could undermine outreach and sustainability of desirable programmes.
“the cost of conventional approaches, US$20 to US$60 per parcel for first time adjudication alone in what were considered successful projects (Burns 2007) and much larger than this in Africa (Jacoby and Minten 2007; Larbi 2011), could undermine outreach and sustainability of the most desirable programmes”
From Environmental and gender impacts of land tenure regularization in Africa: Pilot evidence from Rwanda (2014) · cites this paper as Jacoby and Minten 2007
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Environmental and gender impacts of land tenure regularization in Africa: Pilot evidence from Rwanda
Ali, D. A., Deininger, K., & Goldstein, M. (2014) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2013.12.009 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Land Registration, Governance, and Development: Evidence and Implications for Policy
Deininger, K., & Feder, G. (2009) · The World Bank Research Observer · doi:10.1093/wbro/lkp007 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Land tenure and investment incentives: evidence from West Africa
Fenske, J. (2011) · Journal of Development Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2010.05.001 · Cited by 369 · see citing works
Land tenure security for women: A conceptual framework
Doss, C., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2020) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105080 · Cited by 142 · see citing works
Asaaga, F. A., Hirons, M. A., & Malhi, Y. (2020) · World Development · doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.104913 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Silent privatisation of customary land in Zambia: Opportunities for a few, challenges for many
Chitonge, H., Mfune, O., Umar, B. B., Kajoba, G. M., Banda, D., & Ntsebeza, L. (2017) · Social Dynamics · doi:10.1080/02533952.2017.1356049 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jacoby, H. G., & Minten, B.
- Affiliations
- World Bank (US)
- International Food Policy Research Institute (US)
- Venue
- The World Bank Economic Review
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2007-01-01
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 461-485
- ISSN
- 0258-6770 (ISSN-L)
- 1564-698X
- OpenAlex
- W2119142250
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 19.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- papers.ssrn.com
- Locations
- The World Bank Economic Review (publishedVersion)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- IFPRI E-brary (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
- CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
- International Food Policy Research Institute (International Food Policy Research Institute) (submittedVersion)
- HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agricultural Innovations and Practices
- Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
- Keywords
- land titling, land registration, cost-effectiveness, land investment, land productivity, land value, expropriation risk, rice cultivation, rural Madagascar, sub-Saharan Africa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review