Cited by 387Land Rights and ReformsUrban and Rural Development ChallengesLand Use and Management

Land Registration, Governance, and Development: Evidence and Implications for Policy

Open access
Deininger, K., Feder, G.·2009·The World Bank Research Observer

Abstract

The developmental impact of institutions to establish and maintain secure property rights to land has been a subject of much debate. The authors review the literature on the impact of land administration interventions in specific contexts, highlighting the dependence of outcomes on the governance environment, the effectiveness of the state apparatus, and the distribution of socio-economic power. There is evidence, albeit not uniform, of enhancement of tenure security through land registration with benefits manifesting themselves in higher levels of investment and productivity and a reduced need to defend land rights. Land registration has also been shown to increase activity in land rental markets, leading to higher efficiency overall. Evidence of improved access to credit, due to formalization of land rights, is scant. Even in situations where land registration had positive benefits, the literature contains little rigorous analysis of cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of impacts. The authors conclude that formalization of land rights should not be viewed as a panacea and that interventions should be decided only after a careful diagnosis of the policy, social, and governance environment. If intervention is justified, the performance of land administration systems needs to be benchmarked in terms of coverage, cost-effectiveness, and quality of service provision.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/wbro/lkp007

Cites

109 of 109 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 110 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deininger, K., & Feder, G.
Corresponding author
Deininger, K.
Venue
The World Bank Research Observer
Published
2009-06-11
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
233-266
ISSN
  • 0257-3032 (ISSN-L)
  • 1564-6971
OpenAlex
W2059536435
Cited by
387
References
110
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 11
FWCI
12.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The World Bank Research Observer (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (submittedVersion)
  • CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Urban and Rural Development Challenges
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Land Use and Management
Keywords
land registration, land tenure security, property rights, land administration, governance, state capacity, land rental markets, access to credit, land formalization, cost-effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review