Cited by 28School Choice and PerformanceScience Education and PedagogyTeacher Education and Leadership Studies

Training to Teach Science: Experimental Evidence from Argentina

Open access
Albornoz, Facundo, Anauati, María Victoria, Furman, Melina, Luzuriaga, Mariana, Podestá, María Eugenia, Taylor, Inés·2020·The World Bank Economic Review

Abstract

This paper evaluates the learning impact of different teacher training methods using a randomized controlled trial implemented in 70 state schools in Buenos Aires, Argentina. A control group receiving standard teacher training was compared with two alternative treatment arms: providing a structured curriculum unit or receiving both the unit and weekly coaching. Following a 12-week intervention, there are substantial learning gains for students whose teachers were trained using structured curriculum units, as well as for those whose teachers received coaching (between 55 percent and 64 percent of a standard deviation more than those students in the control group). Coaching teachers does not appear to be cost-effective, as the unit cost per 0.1 standard deviation is more than twice the cost of using only the structured curriculum unit. However, additional coaching is particularly beneficial for inexperienced teachers with less than two years of teaching science. Coaching teachers also showed specific gains for girls, who both learned and declared to enjoy science lessons more. High-performing students especially benefited from both interventions, with students from coached teachers performing particularly well in harder questions. Using structured curriculum units and providing coaching also affected teacher perceptions: teachers expressed that they enjoyed teaching science more and taught more hours of science, and that their students developed more skills. Results from a follow-up survey suggest persistent change in teacher practice, with the vast majority reporting using the structured curriculum unit one year after the intervention.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/wber/lhy010

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Albornoz, F., Anauati, M. V., Furman, M., Luzuriaga, M., Podestá, M. E., & Taylor, I.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham and researcher at CONICET, Nottingham, UK
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
  • Anauati, María Victoria
  • Furman, Melina
  • Luzuriaga, Mariana
  • Podestá, María Eugenia
  • Taylor, Inés
Venue
The World Bank Economic Review
Published
2019-02-13
Volume
34
Issue
2
Pages
393-417
ISSN
  • 0258-6770 (ISSN-L)
  • 1564-698X
OpenAlex
W2780174134
Cited by
28
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1
FWCI
15.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • The World Bank Economic Review (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Nottingham ePrints (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
Keywords
science teacher education, teacher coaching, learning gains, cost-effectiveness, inexperienced teachers, gender differences in science learning, teacher perceptions, teacher practice change, state schools, Buenos Aires

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review