Cited by 97Fire effects on ecosystemsRangeland and Wildlife ManagementEcology and biodiversity studies

The Role of Postfire Coarse Woody Debris in Aspen Regeneration

Ripple, W.J., Larsen, E.J.·2001·Western Journal of Applied Forestry

Abstract

The paucity of aspen (Populus tremuloides) regeneration in the western United States and on Yellowstone National Park's (YNP) northern range has been of concern to managers and scientists for much of the 20th century, with the effects of ungulate browsing, climate fluctuation, and fire suppression being vigorously debated. We analyzed the interaction of fire and elk (Cervus elaphus) browsing in YNP, specifically the role of coarse woody debris as a mechanism for assisting aspen regeneration. We hypothesized that fallen conifers killed in the 1988 YNP fires would provide refugia, allowing a limited amount of aspen regeneration under the current levels of heavy ungulate browsing. We located burned sites on YNP's northern range and searched for “jackstraw piles,” where fallen conifers provided aspen refugia from ungulate browsing. We discovered that aspen suckers protected by fallen conifer barriers were on average over two times the height of adjacent unprotected suckers. Paired t-tests showed a highly significant difference between the aspen heights within the protected jackstraw sites (>0.8 m high) and those in the open that were subjected to elk browsing (P = 0.000). These results illustrate the role that fallen conifers can play in aspen regeneration as well as the interaction of the ecological processes of wildfire, ungulate browsing, and seral stage development. West. J. Appl. For. 16(2):61–64.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/wjaf/16.2.61

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fallen trees provided temporary protection for young aspen from bison and elk.

    “These fallen trees provided temporary protection for young aspen from bison and elk (Beschta et al., 2020; Ripple & Larsen, 2001), as elk densities decreased.”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Ripple & Larsen, 2001

  • In this situation, even small, localized reductions in browsing intensity, such as those provided by fallen trees, can facilitate the growth of young aspen.

    “In this situation, even small, localized reductions in browsing intensity, such as those provided by fallen trees, can facilitate the growth of young aspen (Beschta et al., 2018, 2020; Kuijper et al., 2015; Ripple & Larsen, 2001).”

    From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Ripple & Larsen, 2001

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ripple, W. J., & Larsen, E. J.
Affiliations
Oregon State University (US)
Venue
Western Journal of Applied Forestry
Published
2001-04-01
Volume
16
Issue
2
Pages
61-64
ISSN
  • 0885-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-3770
OpenAlex
W59531954
Cited by
97
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Western Journal of Applied Forestry (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Oregon State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
Keywords
aspen regeneration, Populus tremuloides, coarse woody debris, elk browsing, red deer, forest fires, Yellowstone National Park, ungulate browsing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review