The Role of Postfire Coarse Woody Debris in Aspen Regeneration
Abstract
The paucity of aspen (Populus tremuloides) regeneration in the western United States and on Yellowstone National Park's (YNP) northern range has been of concern to managers and scientists for much of the 20th century, with the effects of ungulate browsing, climate fluctuation, and fire suppression being vigorously debated. We analyzed the interaction of fire and elk (Cervus elaphus) browsing in YNP, specifically the role of coarse woody debris as a mechanism for assisting aspen regeneration. We hypothesized that fallen conifers killed in the 1988 YNP fires would provide refugia, allowing a limited amount of aspen regeneration under the current levels of heavy ungulate browsing. We located burned sites on YNP's northern range and searched for “jackstraw piles,” where fallen conifers provided aspen refugia from ungulate browsing. We discovered that aspen suckers protected by fallen conifer barriers were on average over two times the height of adjacent unprotected suckers. Paired t-tests showed a highly significant difference between the aspen heights within the protected jackstraw sites (>0.8 m high) and those in the open that were subjected to elk browsing (P = 0.000). These results illustrate the role that fallen conifers can play in aspen regeneration as well as the interaction of the ecological processes of wildfire, ungulate browsing, and seral stage development. West. J. Appl. For. 16(2):61–64.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Fallen trees provided temporary protection for young aspen from bison and elk.
“These fallen trees provided temporary protection for young aspen from bison and elk (Beschta et al., 2020; Ripple & Larsen, 2001), as elk densities decreased.”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Ripple & Larsen, 2001
In this situation, even small, localized reductions in browsing intensity, such as those provided by fallen trees, can facilitate the growth of young aspen.
“In this situation, even small, localized reductions in browsing intensity, such as those provided by fallen trees, can facilitate the growth of young aspen (Beschta et al., 2018, 2020; Kuijper et al., 2015; Ripple & Larsen, 2001).”
From Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings (2023) · cites this paper as Ripple & Larsen, 2001
Cites
Aspen, Elk, and Fire in Northern Yellowstone Park
Romme, W. H., Turner, M. G., Wallace, L. L., & Walker, J. S. (1995) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1941684 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Historic aspen recruitment, elk, and wolves in northern Yellowstone National Park, USA
Ripple, W. J., & Larsen, E. J. (2000) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00014-8 · Cited by 308 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Trophic cascades among wolves, elk and aspen on Yellowstone National Park’s northern range
Ripple, W. J., Larsen, E. J., Renkin, R. A., & Smith, D. W. (2001) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(01)00107-0 · Cited by 452 · see citing works
Self-citationThe combustion of sound and rotten coarse woody debris: a review
Hyde, J. C., Smith, A. M. S., Ottmar, R. D., Alvarado, E. C., & Morgan, P. (2011) · International Journal of Wildland Fire · doi:10.1071/wf09113 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Winnie, J. A. (2012) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/11-1990.1 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Bison alter the northern Yellowstone ecosystem by breaking aspen saplings
Painter, L. E., Beschta, R. L., & Ripple, W. J. (2023) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.10369 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Self-citation
- Authors
- Ripple, W. J., & Larsen, E. J.
- Affiliations
- Oregon State University (US)
- ORCID
- Ripple, W.J.
- Venue
- Western Journal of Applied Forestry
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-04-01
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 61-64
- ISSN
- 0885-6095 (ISSN-L)
- 1938-3770
- OpenAlex
- W59531954
- Cited by
- 97
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 4.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Western Journal of Applied Forestry (publishedVersion)
- Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Oregon State University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Rangeland and Wildlife Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Ecology and biodiversity studies
- Keywords
- aspen regeneration, Populus tremuloides, coarse woody debris, elk browsing, red deer, forest fires, Yellowstone National Park, ungulate browsing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review