The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Legume-Nodulating Betaproteobacteria: Diversity, Host Range, and Future Prospects
Open accessAbstract
Rhizobia form specialized nodules on the roots of legumes (family Fabaceae) and fix nitrogen in exchange for carbon from the host plant. Although the majority of legumes form symbioses with members of genus Rhizobium and its relatives in class Alphaproteobacteria, some legumes, such as those in the large genus Mimosa, are nodulated predominantly by betaproteobacteria in the genera Burkholderia and Cupriavidus. The principal centers of diversity of these bacteria are in central Brazil and South Africa. Molecular phylogenetic studies have shown that betaproteobacteria have existed as legume symbionts for approximately 50 million years, and that, although they have a common origin, the symbiosis genes in both subclasses have evolved separately since then. Additionally, some species of genus Burkholderia, such as B. phymatum, are highly promiscuous, effectively nodulating several important legumes, including common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). In contrast to genus Burkholderia, only one species of genus Cupriavidus (C. taiwanensis) has so far been shown to nodulate legumes. The recent availability of the genome sequences of C. taiwanensis, B. phymatum, and B. tuberum has paved the way for a more detailed analysis of the evolutionary and mechanistic differences between nodulating strains of alpha- and betaproteobacteria. Initial analyses of genome sequences have suggested that plant-associated Burkholderia spp. have lower G+C contents than Burkholderia spp. that are opportunistic human pathogens, thus supporting previous suggestions that the plant- and human-associated groups of Burkholderia actually belong in separate genera.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A manual for the practical study of root-nodule bacteria
Vincent, J. M. (1970) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,350
Compant, S., Duffy, B., Nowak, J., Clément, C., & Barka, E. A. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.9.4951-4959.2005 · Cited by 2,640
IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation
Markowitz, V. M., Mavromatis, K., Ivanova, N. N., Chen, I.-M. A., Chu, K., & Kyrpides, N. C. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393 · Cited by 817
100 of the World's Worst Invasive Alien Species
van der Weijden, W., Leewis, R., & Bol, P. (2007) · Biological Globalisation · doi:10.1163/9789004278110_019 · Cited by 776
Nodulation of legumes by members of the β-subclass of Proteobacteria
Moulin, L., Munive, A., Dreyfus, B., & Boivin-Masson, C. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35082070 · Cited by 703
Self-citationLegumes Symbioses: Absence of Nod Genes in Photosynthetic Bradyrhizobia
Giraud, E., Moulin, L., Vallenet, D., Barbe, V., Cytryn, E., Avarre, J.-C., Jaubert, M., Simon, D., Cartieaux, F., Prin, Y., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139548 · Cited by 618
Self-citationSullivan, J. T., & Ronson, C. W. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.9.5145 · Cited by 606
The genome of Rhizobium leguminosarum has recognizable core and accessory components
Young, J. P. W., Crossman, L. C., Johnston, A. W., Thomson, N. R., Ghazoui, Z. F., Hull, K. H., Wexler, M., Curson, A. R., Todd, J. D., Poole, P. S., et al. (2006) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-4-r34 · Cited by 577
Self-citationEstrada-De Los Santos, P., Bustillos-Cristales, R., & Caballero-Mellado, J. (2001) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.67.6.2790-2798.2001 · Cited by 467
Self-citationSour skin, a bacterial rot of Onion bulbs.
Burkholder, W. H. (1950) · Phytopathology · Cited by 425
Cited by
Biological nitrogen fixation: rates, patterns and ecological controls in terrestrial ecosystems
Vitousek, P. M., Menge, D. N. L., Reed, S. C., & Cleveland, C. C. (2013) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0119 · Cited by 800
Metadata
- Authors
- Gyaneshwar, P., Hirsch, A. M., Moulin, L., Chen, W.-M., Elliott, G. N., Bontemps, C., Estrada-de los Santos, P., Gross, E., dos Reis, F. B., Sprent, J. I., Young, J. P. W., & James, E. K.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2011-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1276-1288
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2161414772
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 30.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Legume-Nodulating Betaproteobacteria: Diversity, Host Range, and Future Prospects. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi-06-11-0172
- The paper
- Gyaneshwar, P., Hirsch, A. M., Moulin, L., Chen, W.-M., Elliott, G. N., Bontemps, C., Estrada-de los Santos, P., Gross, E., dos Reis, F. B., Sprent, J. I., Young, J. P. W., & James, E. K. (2011). Legume-Nodulating Betaproteobacteria: Diversity, Host Range, and Future Prospects. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-06-11-0172
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.