The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation
Open accessAbstract
Motivation: A rapidly increasing number of microbial genomes are sequenced by organizations worldwide and are eventually included into various public genome data resources. The quality of the annotations depends largely on the original dataset providers, with erroneous or incomplete annotations often carried over into the public resources and difficult to correct. Results: We have developed an Expert Review (ER) version of the Integrated Microbial Genomes (IMG) system, with the goal of supporting systematic and efficient revision of microbial genome annotations. IMG ER provides tools for the review and curation of annotations of both new and publicly available microbial genomes within IMG's rich integrated genome framework. New genome datasets are included into IMG ER prior to their public release either with their native annotations or with annotations generated by IMG ER's annotation pipeline. IMG ER tools allow addressing annotation problems detected with IMG's comparative analysis tools, such as genes missed by gene prediction pipelines or genes without an associated function. Over the past year, IMG ER was used for improving the annotations of about 150 microbial genomes. Contact: vmmarkowitz@lbl.gov Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Caspi, R., Billington, R., Ferrer, L., Foerster, H., Fulcher, C. A., Keseler, I. M., Kothari, A., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., Mueller, L. A., et al. (2016) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkv1164 · Cited by 3,395
Cited by
Analysis of Fusobacterium persistence and antibiotic response in colorectal cancer
Bullman, S., Pedamallu, C. S., Sicinska, E., Clancy, T. E., Zhang, X., Cai, D., Neuberg, D., Huang, K., Guevara, F., Nelson, T., et al. (2017) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aal5240 · Cited by 1,574
Improving the coverage of the cyanobacterial phylum using diversity driven genome sequencing
Shih, P. M., Wu, D., Latifi, A., Axen, S. D., Fewer, D. P., Talla, E., Calteau, A., Cai, F., Tandeau de Marsac, N., Rippka, R., et al. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1217107110 · Cited by 800
Durham, B. P., Grote, J., Whittaker, K. A., Bender, S. J., Luo, H., Grim, S. L., Brown, J. M., Casey, J. R., Dron, A., Florez-Leiva, L., et al. (2014) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.4056/sigs.4998989 · Cited by 62
Draft genome sequence of Arthrospira platensis C1 (PCC9438)
Cheevadhanarak, S., Paithoonrangsarid, K., Prommeenate, P., Kaewngam, W., Musigkain, A., Tragoonrung, S., Tabata, S., Kaneko, T., Chaijaruwanich, J., Sangsrakru, D., et al. (2012) · Standards in Genomic Sciences · doi:10.4056/sigs.2525955 · Cited by 59
Tang, S., Wang, P. H., Higgins, S. A., Löffler, F. E., & Edwards, E. A. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.00100 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Markowitz, V. M., Mavromatis, K., Ivanova, N. N., Chen, I.-M. A., Chu, K., & Kyrpides, N. C.
- Venue
- Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2009-06-27
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 2271-2278
- ISSN
- 1367-4803 (ISSN-L)
- 1367-4811
- OpenAlex
- W2136231029
- Cited by
- 817
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393
- The paper
- Markowitz, V. M., Mavromatis, K., Ivanova, N. N., Chen, I.-M. A., Chu, K., & Kyrpides, N. C. (2009). IMG ER: a system for microbial genome annotation expert review and curation. Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp393
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.