The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Callose Deposition: A Multifaceted Plant Defense Response
Open accessAbstract
Callose deposition in Arabidopsis has emerged as a popular model system to quantify activity of plant immunity. However, there has been a noticeable rise in contradicting reports about the regulation of pathogen-induced callose. To address this controversy, we have examined the robustness of callose deposition under different growth conditions and in response to two different pathogen-associated molecular patterns, the flagellin epitope Flg22 and the polysaccharide chitosan. Based on a commonly used hydroponic culture system, we found that variations in growth conditions have a major impact on the plant's overall capacity to deposit callose. This environmental variability correlated with levels of hydrogen peroxide (H 2 O 2) production. Depending on the growth conditions, pretreatment with abscissic acid stimulated or repressed callose deposition. Despite a similar effect of growth conditions on Flg22- and chitosan-induced callose, both responses showed differences in timing, tissue responsiveness, and colocalization with H 2 O 2. Furthermore, mutant analysis revealed that Flg22- and chitosan-induced callose differ in the requirement for the NADPH oxidase RBOHD, the glucosinolate regulatory enzymes VTC1 and PEN2, and the callose synthase PMR4. Our study demonstrates that callose is a multifaceted defense response that is controlled by distinct signaling pathways, depending on the environmental conditions and the challenging pathogen-associated molecular pattern.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pectins: structure, biosynthesis, and oligogalacturonide-related signaling
Ridley, B. L., O'Neill, M. A., & Mohnen, D. (2001) · Phytochemistry · doi:10.1016/s0031-9422(01)00113-3 · Cited by 1,912
Cited by
The interaction of plant biotic and abiotic stresses: from genes to the field
Atkinson, N. J., & Urwin, P. E. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Botany · doi:10.1093/jxb/ers100 · Cited by 1,880
Next-Generation Systemic Acquired Resistance
Luna, E., Bruce, T. J. A., Roberts, M. R., Flors, V., & Ton, J. (2012) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.187468 · Cited by 721
Self-citationRegulation of the NADPH Oxidase RBOHD During Plant Immunity
Kadota, Y., Shirasu, K., & Zipfel, C. (2015) · Plant and Cell Physiology · doi:10.1093/pcp/pcv063 · Cited by 641
The role of the cell wall in plant immunity
Malinovsky, F. G., Fangel, J. U., & Willats, W. G. T. (2014) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2014.00178 · Cited by 555
Benzoxazinoid Metabolites Regulate Innate Immunity against Aphids and Fungi in Maize
Ahmad, S., Veyrat, N., Gordon-Weeks, R., Zhang, Y., Martin, J., Smart, L., Glauser, G., Erb, M., Flors, V., Frey, M., et al. (2011) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.111.180224 · Cited by 388
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Luna, E., Pastor, V., Robert, J., Flors, V., Mauch-Mani, B., & Ton, J.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2011-02
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-193
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W2039396577
- Cited by
- 765
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 22.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Callose Deposition: A Multifaceted Plant Defense Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi-07-10-0149
- The paper
- Luna, E., Pastor, V., Robert, J., Flors, V., Mauch-Mani, B., & Ton, J. (2011). Callose Deposition: A Multifaceted Plant Defense Response. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-07-10-0149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.