The DOI matches its Crossref record; 116 of the 116 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular Aspects of Plant Growth Promotion and Protection by Bacillus subtilis
Open accessAbstract
Bacillus subtilis is one of the most widely studied plant growth–promoting rhizobacteria. It is able to promote plant growth as well as control plant pathogens through diverse mechanisms, including the improvement of nutrient availability and alteration of phytohormone homeostasis as well as the production of antimicrobials and triggering induced systemic resistance, respectively. Even though its benefits for crop production have been recognized and studied extensively under laboratory conditions, the success of its application in fields varies immensely. It is widely accepted that agricultural application of B. subtilis often fails because the bacteria are not able to persist in the rhizosphere. Bacterial colonization of plant roots is a crucial step in the interaction between microbe and plant and seems, therefore, to be of great importance for its growth promotion and biocontrol effects. A successful root colonization depends thereby on both bacterial traits, motility and biofilm formation, as well as on a signal interplay with the plant. This review addresses current knowledge about plant-microbial interactions of the B. subtilis species, including the various mechanisms for supporting plant growth as well as the necessity for the establishment of the relationship. [Formula: see text] The author(s) have dedicated the work to the public domain under the Creative Commons CC0 “No Rights Reserved” license by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights, to the extent allowed by law.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes
Qin, J., Li, Y., Cai, Z., Li, S., Zhu, J., Zhang, F., Liang, S., Zhang, W., Guan, Y., Shen, D., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11450 · Cited by 6,762
Biofilms: an emergent form of bacterial life
Flemming, H.-C., Wingender, J., Szewzyk, U., Steinberg, P., Rice, S. A., & Kjelleberg, S. (2016) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro.2016.94 · Cited by 5,979
The rhizosphere microbiome and plant health
Berendsen, R. L., Pieterse, C. M. J., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2012) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2012.04.001 · Cited by 5,347
Plant-Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria
Lugtenberg, B., & Kamilova, F. (2009) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162918 · Cited by 3,987
Plant–microbiome interactions: from community assembly to plant health
Trivedi, P., Leach, J. E., Tringe, S. G., Sa, T., & Singh, B. K. (2020) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-020-0412-1 · Cited by 3,904
Induced systemic resistance by beneficial microbes
Pieterse, C. M. J., Zamioudis, C., Berendsen, R. L., Weller, D. M., Van Wees, S. C. M., & Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2014) · Annual Review of Phytopathology · doi:10.1146/annurev-phyto-082712-102340 · Cited by 3,272
Fuqua, W. C., Winans, S. C., & Greenberg, E. P. (1994) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.176.2.269-275.1994 · Cited by 2,927
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture
Bhattacharyya, P. N., & Jha, D. K. (2012) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9 · Cited by 2,848
Bacillus lipopeptides: versatile weapons for plant disease biocontrol
Ongena, M., & Jacques, P. (2008) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2007.12.009 · Cited by 2,418
Feed Your Friends: Do Plant Exudates Shape the Root Microbiome?
Sasse, J., Martinoia, E., & Northen, T. (2018) · Trends in Plant Science · doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2017.09.003 · Cited by 2,216
Cited by
Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation and social interactions
Arnaouteli, S., Bamford, N. C., Stanley-Wall, N. R., & Kovács, Á. T. (2021) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41579-021-00540-9 · Cited by 532
Self-citationSun, X., Xu, Z., Xie, J., Hesselberg-Thomsen, V., Tan, T., Zheng, D., Strube, M. L., Dragoš, A., Shen, Q., Zhang, R., et al. (2022) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/s41396-021-01125-3 · Cited by 455
Self-citationGrigs, O., Didrihsone, E., & Bolmanis, E. (2023) · Fermentation · doi:10.3390/fermentation9040390 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Blake, C., Christensen, M. N., & Kovács, Á. T.
- Venue
- Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®
- Publisher
- Scientific Societies
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 34
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 15-25
- ISSN
- 0894-0282 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7706
- OpenAlex
- W3091087818
- Cited by
- 357
- References
- 116
- FWCI
- 19.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Aspects of Plant Growth Promotion and Protection by Bacillus subtilis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1094/mpmi-08-20-0225-cr
- The paper
- Blake, C., Christensen, M. N., & Kovács, Á. T. (2021). Molecular Aspects of Plant Growth Promotion and Protection by Bacillus subtilis. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions®. https://doi.org/10.1094/mpmi-08-20-0225-cr
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.